[2001] KEHC 245 (KLR)
The court found that the evidence presented by the prosecution did not sufficiently link the appellant to the offence of stealing stock. The testimony of PW.2, the Assistant Chief, indicated that only two young men were seen driving the cow, which corroborated the appellant's claim that he was not in the company of...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2001] KEHC 245 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Josphat Kahindi Charo; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Mombasa
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- ? 66 of 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal allowed; conviction quashed; sentence set aside; appellant to be set at liberty unless otherwise lawfully held.
- Legal Topics
- Stock Theft, Criminal Appeals, Evidence Evaluation
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Josphat Kahindi Charo
Appellant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the evidence adduced was sufficient to link the appellant to the offence of stealing stock.
- 2 Whether the conviction of the appellant was safe in light of the evidence presented.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the evidence presented by the prosecution did not sufficiently link the appellant to the offence of stealing stock. The testimony of PW.2, the Assistant Chief, indicated that only two young men were seen driving the cow, which corroborated the appellant's claim that he was not in the company of the two co-accused who pleaded guilty. In the absence of direct or circumstantial evidence connecting the appellant to the theft, the court held that it would be unsafe to allow the conviction to stand. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, the conviction quashed, and the sentence set aside.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed; conviction quashed; sentence set aside; appellant to be set at liberty unless otherwise lawfully held.
Orders
- The appeal is allowed.
- The conviction is quashed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
6 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MOMBASA APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.66 OF 2001 (From Original Conviction and Sentence in Criminal Case No.728 of 2000 of the Resident magistrate’s Court at Kaloleni –K. Muneeni, Esq., - R.M.) JOSPHAT KAHINDI CHARO………………………………..APPELLANT =V E R S U S= REPUBLIC…………………………………………………RESPONDENT J U D G M E N T
The appellant was convicted of Stealing stock contrary to Section 278 of the Penal Code and was sentenced to 2 years imprisonment with 4 strokes of the cane. His appeal to this court is against that conviction and sentence. The prosecution case was that on the 24. 8.2000 PW.1’s cow was stolen and at about 11 a.m. the appellant and two others were found driving the said stolen cow. They were arrested by PW.2 Assistant Chief of the area and were taken to Police where they were charged with this offence. The two people who were charged together with the appellant admitted the charge and were convicted and sentenced. But the appellant denied any involvement in the theft. In his defence he denied to have been together with the two who pleaded guilty. He said the two were walking ahead of him but denied that they were together.
PW.2 in his evidence stated in his evidence that he had met two young men driving a cow and he arrested them. This supports the evidence of the appellant that he was not in the company of the other two who were with him and who had pleaded guilty to the charge. There was no evidence linking the appellant to the charge and it follows therefore that it would be unsafe to allow the conviction to stand.
I allow the appeal, quash the conviction and set aside the sentence and order that the appellant be set at liberty unless otherwise lawfully held.
Dated and delivered at Mombasa this 9th day of October, 2001. J.L.A. OSIEMO J U D G E