[2014] KEHC 6161 (KLR)

[2014] KEHC 6161 (KLR)

The court found that the application was unopposed and that the plaintiff had demonstrated sufficient grounds for the grant of an order of inhibition to preserve the suit property and to restrain the defendant from interfering with the plaintiff's occupation. The absence of opposition and the need to maintain the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2014] KEHC 6161 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Josphat Kirigia M'Itura; Defendant: Mohammed Abdi Muthee
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Meru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 255 of 2013
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Inhibition and Restraining Orders
Outcome
Application allowed as unopposed. Orders of inhibition and restraint granted. Costs awarded to the plaintiff.
Judges
FM Njoroge
Legal Topics
Inhibition Orders, Interlocutory Injunctions, Land Disputes
Source Language
en
Land and Property Inhibition Orders Interlocutory Injunctions Land Disputes

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Josphat Kirigia M'Itura

Plaintiff

Mohammed Abdi Muthee

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Inhibition and Restraining Orders

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to an order of inhibition against dealings with parcel 1043/ANTUBETWE/KIONGO ADJ. SECTION pending hearing and determination of the suit.
  2. 2 Whether the defendant should be restrained from interfering with the plaintiff's occupation of the suit land.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the application was unopposed and that the plaintiff had demonstrated sufficient grounds for the grant of an order of inhibition to preserve the suit property and to restrain the defendant from interfering with the plaintiff's occupation. The absence of opposition and the need to maintain the status quo pending the hearing and determination of the main suit justified the grant of the orders sought. The court accordingly allowed the application and awarded costs to the plaintiff.

Court Disposition

Application allowed as unopposed. Orders of inhibition and restraint granted. Costs awarded to the plaintiff.

Orders

  • An order of inhibition is issued to inhibit any dealing with parcel 1043/ANTUBETWE/KIONGO ADJ. SECTION until the suit is heard and determined.
  • The defendant is restrained from interfering with the plaintiff's peaceful occupation of parcel 1043/ANTUBETWE/KIONGO ADJ. SECTION until the suit is heard and determined.