[2021] KEELC 4729 (KLR)

[2021] KEELC 4729 (KLR)

The court found that the Applicants, having purchased their plots from the 1st Defendant in the same manner as the existing Plaintiffs, have a sufficient and common interest in the subject matter of the suit. The court held that the Applicants' interests are directly affected by the outcome of the proceedings, and...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEELC 4729 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Josphat Macharia and 49 others; Kenya Assemblies of God Church (suing through Isaac Kasili, Casper Musungu and Harun Kahuki); Defendant: Leltayet Court Developers Ltd; Defendant: Fuelex Kenya Limited
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 423 of 2008
Procedural Posture
Notice of Motion / Ruling on Application for Joinder of Parties as Plaintiffs
Outcome
application for joinder allowed
Legal Topics
Joinder of Parties, Land Sale Disputes, Privity of Contract, Limitation Periods
Source Language
en
Land and Property Joinder of Parties Land Sale Disputes Privity of Contract Limitation Periods

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Josphat Macharia and 49 others; Kenya Assemblies of God Church (suing through Isaac Kasili, Casper Musungu and Harun Kahuki)

Plaintiff

Leltayet Court Developers Ltd

Defendant

Fuelex Kenya Limited

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Notice of Motion / Ruling on Application for Joinder of Parties as Plaintiffs

  1. 1 Whether the Applicants have demonstrated sufficient interest to be enjoined as Plaintiffs in the suit.
  2. 2 Whether the Applicants' delay in seeking joinder is justified.
  3. 3 Whether the Applicants have privity of contract with the 2nd Defendant.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the Applicants, having purchased their plots from the 1st Defendant in the same manner as the existing Plaintiffs, have a sufficient and common interest in the subject matter of the suit. The court held that the Applicants' interests are directly affected by the outcome of the proceedings, and their joinder would enable the court to effectively and completely adjudicate upon all matters in dispute. The court was not persuaded by the 2nd Defendant's arguments regarding delay, lack of privity, or limitation, as these issues do not preclude joinder at this stage. The Applicants were therefore entitled to be enjoined as Plaintiffs.

Court Disposition

application for joinder allowed

Orders

  • The Applicants are enjoined as the 51st, 52nd, and 53rd Plaintiffs in the suit.
  • The Plaint is to be amended accordingly within 14 days to reflect the joinder of the three Applicants as Plaintiffs.