[2017] KEELC 3372 (KLR)
The court found that the Plaintiff had demonstrated, through documentary and oral evidence, that she was the rightful proprietor of parcel number 34, and that the Defendant was the rightful proprietor of parcel number 35. The registration of the parties as proprietors of the wrong parcels was a result of a mistake...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2017] KEELC 3372 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Josphine Kasyoka Musingi; Defendant: Benson Nzoka Lau
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Machakos
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Environment & Land Case 51 of 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Land and Property Suit / Judgment
- Outcome
- Plaintiff's suit allowed. Orders for rectification of the land register granted. Costs awarded to Plaintiff.
- Judges
- OA Angote
- Legal Topics
- Land Registration, Rectification of Register, Adjudication Process, Ownership Dispute
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Josphine Kasyoka Musingi
Plaintiff
Benson Nzoka Lau
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Land and Property Suit / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the registration of the Plaintiff and Defendant as proprietors of parcels Simisi/Ilamba/34 and Simisi/Ilamba/35 respectively was done by mistake.
- 2 Whether the land register should be rectified to reflect the correct proprietors of the respective parcels.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the Plaintiff had demonstrated, through documentary and oral evidence, that she was the rightful proprietor of parcel number 34, and that the Defendant was the rightful proprietor of parcel number 35. The registration of the parties as proprietors of the wrong parcels was a result of a mistake during the adjudication process. The Defendant did not contest the Plaintiff's claim, and the evidence was uncontroverted. The court held that it was just and proper to rectify the land register to reflect the correct proprietors in accordance with the Registry Index Map and the actual occupation of the land. The Plaintiff's suit was therefore allowed, and orders for...
Court Disposition
Plaintiff's suit allowed. Orders for rectification of the land register granted. Costs awarded to Plaintiff.
Orders
- Cancellation of the registration of Benson Nzoka Lau as proprietor of Simisi/Ilamba/34 and his registration as proprietor of Simisi/Ilamba/35.
- Cancellation of the registration of Josephine Kasyoka Musingi as proprietor of Simisi/Ilamba/35 and her registration as proprietor of Simisi/Ilamba/34.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
28 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT AT MACHAKOS
ELC CASE NO. 51 OF 2016
JOSPHINE KASYOKA MUSINGI…………………….......…PLAINTIFF
VERSUS
BENSON NZOKA LAU……………………………………DEFENDANT
JUDGMENT
1. In her Plaint dated 4th July, 2016, the Plaintiff averred that on 16th February, 2010, she purchased a portion of undemarcated parcel of land from Peter Kitaa Musembi for Kshs. 70,000; that the portion of land she bought lies between the Defendant’s parcel of land and the remaining land belonging to Peter Kitaa Musembi and that the area was declared an adjudication section in the year 2011.
2. The Plaintiff has averred in her Plaint that during the adjudication process, the parcel of land that the Defendant resides on was registered as parcel number Simisi/Ilamba/35 while the land that she bought was registered as parcel number 34 but in the Defendant’s name.
3. It is the Plaintiff’s case that the registration of her parcel of land as Simisi/Ilamba/34 and that of the Defendant as Simisi/Ilamba/35 was made by mistake; that the register should be rectified in respect of the two parcels of land and that the Plaint should be allowed. Although the Defendant was served with the Summons to Enter Appearance and the Plaint, he neither entered appearance nor filed a Defence.
4. The matter proceeded for hearing on 2nd March, 2017.
5. In her evidence, the Plaintiff reiterated the contents of her Plaint which I have summarized above.
6. It was the evidence of PW1 that she bought her parcel of land from Peter before the area was declared an adjudication area; that her land is in between the Defendant’s land and the remaining portion of Peter Musembi’s land and that there was a mix up of numbers during the adjudication process that commenced in the year 2011.
7. PW1 produced in evidence the Registry Index Map which indicates her parcel of land as parcel number 34 while the Defendant’s parcel of land is indicated as parcel number 35.
8. However, it was the evidence of PW1 that when the Title Deeds were issued, she was registered as the proprietor of parcel number 35 instead of parcel number 34 while the Defendant was registered as the proprietor of parcel number 34 instead of parcel number 35. PW1 produced in evidence the copies of the official searches in respect of the two parcels of land.
9. The person who sold to the Plaintiff the land that she is currently occupying, PW2, informed the court that the Plaintiff is the proprietor of parcel of land number 34 and not 35; that it is the Plaintiff who is his immediate neighbour and not the Defendant and that the register in respect of the two parcels of land should be rectified.
10. As I have stated above, the Defendant did not file a Defence to rebutt the Plaintiff’s assertion.
11. The Plaintiff and PW2 have shown by way of evidence that it is the Plaintiff who is occupying parcel of land number 34, which is in between the land that the Defendant is occupying (parcel number 35) and the land belonging to PW2 (parcel number 36).
12. The uncontroverted evidence before the court shows that the Defendant and the Plaintiff were registered as the proprietors of parcel of land numbers 34 and 35 respectively by mistake.
13. Instead, the Plaintiff should have been registered as the proprietor of parcel of land number 34 while the Defendant should have been registered the owner of parcel of land number 35.
14. In the circumstances, the register in respect of the two parcels of land should be rectified to reflect the correct position viz-a-viz the Registered Index Map and the parties herein.
15. For those reasons, I allow the Plaintiff’s Plaint dated 4th July, 2016 as follows:
a) An order of cancellation of the registration of Benson Nzoka Lau as the proprietor of land parcel number Simisi/Ilamba 34 and his registration as the proprietor of land parcel number Simisi/Ilamba/35 be and is hereby issued.
b) An order for cancellation of the registration of Josephine Kasyoka Musingi as the proprietor of land parcel number Simisi/Ilamba/35 and her registration as the proprietor of parcel of land number Simisi/Ilamba/34 be and is hereby issued.
c) The Defendant to pay the costs of the suit.
DATED AND DELIVERED AT MACHAKOS THIS 24TH DAY OF MARCH, 2017.
OSCAR A. ANGOTE
JUDGE