[2017] KEELRC 986 (KLR)

[2017] KEELRC 986 (KLR)

The court held that it does not have jurisdiction to extend the time for filing claims under the Employment Act once the statutory limitation period has expired. Section 90 of the Employment Act prescribes a strict limitation period for employment-related claims, and the court is not empowered to grant extensions...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] KEELRC 986 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Jotham Barasa Lusasi; Respondent: Kenyatta National Hospital
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
? 46 of 2016
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Ex Parte Originating Summons Seeking Extension of Time
Outcome
application dismissed
Judges
DI Wasike
Legal Topics
Limitation Periods, Jurisdiction of Court, Extension of Time
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Limitation Periods Jurisdiction of Court Extension of Time

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jotham Barasa Lusasi

Applicant

Kenyatta National Hospital

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Ex Parte Originating Summons Seeking Extension of Time

  1. 1 Whether the Employment and Labour Relations Court has jurisdiction to extend time for filing claims under the Employment Act after the statutory limitation period has lapsed.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that it does not have jurisdiction to extend the time for filing claims under the Employment Act once the statutory limitation period has expired. Section 90 of the Employment Act prescribes a strict limitation period for employment-related claims, and the court is not empowered to grant extensions after this period lapses. Consequently, the application for extension of time was dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The application is dismissed with no order as to costs.