[2017] KEHC 4544 (KLR)

[2017] KEHC 4544 (KLR)

The court found that the Petitioners had established a prima facie case, having been registered as absolute proprietors of the suit properties following a lawful adjudication process, and that their titles were upheld by the Court of Appeal. The Respondents' actions in purporting to review and cancel the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] KEHC 4544 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Joyce Muthoni Waciuma; Applicant: Margaret Wanjiru Waruhiu; Applicant: Alice Wangechi Gichuki as personal representative of Lt. Col. G.K.N. Gichuki; Applicant: Margaret Wangui Gito; Applicant: Henry Moses Thairu; Applicant: Willie Lewis Wanjohi; Applicant: Hannah Wangeci Kinoti; Applicant: Michael Muturi Karanja and Eva Karungari Chege; Applicant: Elizabeth Wanjiku Mathare as the personal representative of John Wallace Mathare; Applicant: Rebecca Njeri Karanja; Applicant: Eric Cato Nottingham; Applicant: Faith Njambi Waciuma; Applicant: Jacqueline Wambui Nottingham; Applicant: Fiona Wanjiku Nottingham; Applicant: Monique Wangui Matu and Charles Mathai Matu; Applicant: Christopher Githaiga Nottingham; Applicant: Brenda Wanjiru Nottingham; Applicant: Peter Gicheha Njuguna and Njoroge Ndembo; Respondent: National Land Commission; Respondent: Chief Land Registrar; Respondent: Honourable Attorney General
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kajiado
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Petition 7 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Petition / Interlocutory Application (ruling on Interim Injunction)
Outcome
Interim status quo order granted; costs in the cause.
Legal Topics
Right to Property, Land Title Cancellation, Public Land Review, Injunctive Relief, Due Process, Administrative Action
Source Language
en
Land and Property Constitutional Law Right to Property Land Title Cancellation Public Land Review Injunctive Relief Due Process Administrative Action

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Joyce Muthoni Waciuma

Applicant

Margaret Wanjiru Waruhiu

Applicant

Alice Wangechi Gichuki as personal representative of Lt. Col. G.K.N. Gichuki

Applicant

Margaret Wangui Gito

Applicant

Henry Moses Thairu

Applicant

Willie Lewis Wanjohi

Applicant

Hannah Wangeci Kinoti

Applicant

Michael Muturi Karanja and Eva Karungari Chege

Applicant

Elizabeth Wanjiku Mathare as the personal representative of John Wallace Mathare

Applicant

Rebecca Njeri Karanja

Applicant

Eric Cato Nottingham

Applicant

Faith Njambi Waciuma

Applicant

Jacqueline Wambui Nottingham

Applicant

Fiona Wanjiku Nottingham

Applicant

Monique Wangui Matu and Charles Mathai Matu

Applicant

Christopher Githaiga Nottingham

Applicant

Brenda Wanjiru Nottingham

Applicant

Peter Gicheha Njuguna and Njoroge Ndembo

Applicant

National Land Commission

Respondent

Chief Land Registrar

Respondent

Honourable Attorney General

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Constitutional Petition / Interlocutory Application (ruling on Interim Injunction)

  1. 1 Whether the Petitioners are entitled to interim injunctive relief to restrain the Respondents from cancelling, de-registering, or reallocating their land titles pending determination of the Petition.
  2. 2 Whether the actions of the Respondents in reviewing and purporting to cancel the Petitioners' land titles violate the Petitioners' constitutional rights under Articles 40 and 47 of the Constitution.
  3. 3 Whether the substratum of the suit should be preserved to prevent irreparable harm before the main Petition is heard and determined.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the Petitioners had established a prima facie case, having been registered as absolute proprietors of the suit properties following a lawful adjudication process, and that their titles were upheld by the Court of Appeal. The Respondents' actions in purporting to review and cancel the Petitioners' titles, without affording them adequate notice or due process, raised serious constitutional issues under Articles 40 and 47. Given the imminent risk of cancellation and the potential loss of the substratum of the suit, the court exercised its discretion under Rule 32 of the Environment and Land Court Practice Directions to order maintenance of the status quo. The application...

Court Disposition

Interim status quo order granted; costs in the cause.

Orders

  • Status quo to be maintained in respect of the suit properties pending hearing and determination of the Petition.
  • Parties to comply with Order 11 and set the Petition down for hearing as soon as possible.