[2023] KEELRC 1384 (KLR)
The court found that the claimant, being a resident of Kapsabet and having worked at Nakuru East Branch at the time of termination, ought to have filed the claim at Nakuru or Eldoret, not Nairobi. Accordingly, the court deferred ruling on the interlocutory application and ordered the transfer of the claim to the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2023] KEELRC 1384 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Kiptoo Jubilous; Respondent: The Cooperative Bank of Kenya Limited
- Court
- Employment and Labour Relations Court
- Court Station
- Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Cause E308 of 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Cause / Ruling on Interlocutory Application; Transfer of Suit
- Outcome
- Claim transferred to Nakuru; ruling on application deferred.
- Judges
- J Rika
- Legal Topics
- Unfair Termination, Employment Contracts, Jurisdiction, Staff Loans, Injunctive Relief
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kiptoo Jubilous
Applicant
The Cooperative Bank of Kenya Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Ruling on Interlocutory Application; Transfer of Suit
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi has jurisdiction to hear the claim given the claimant's place of work and residence.
- 2 Whether the application for injunctive relief regarding the sale of the claimant's property and loan interest rates should be determined at Nairobi or transferred.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the claimant, being a resident of Kapsabet and having worked at Nakuru East Branch at the time of termination, ought to have filed the claim at Nakuru or Eldoret, not Nairobi. Accordingly, the court deferred ruling on the interlocutory application and ordered the transfer of the claim to the Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nakuru for further directions. The application for injunctive relief would be placed before the Nakuru court on an accelerated basis.
Court Disposition
Claim transferred to Nakuru; ruling on application deferred.
Orders
- The claim is transferred to the Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nakuru.
- The application dated December 16, 2022 shall be placed before the court at Nakuru on an accelerated basis for further directions.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
29 paragraphs
Jubilous v Cooperative Bank of Kenya Limited (Cause E308 of 2022) [2023] KEELRC 1384 (KLR) (31 May 2023) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2023] KEELRC 1384 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Cause E308 of 2022
J Rika, J
May 31, 2023
Between
Kiptoo Jubilous
Claimant
and
The Cooperative Bank of Kenya Limited
Respondent
Ruling
1. The claimant was an Employee of the respondent Bank.
2. He was employed on April 11, 2011, as Direct Sales Representative.
3. His contract was terminated by the respondent on February 17, 2020.
4. His performance was alleged to be unsatisfactory, leading to the decision by the respondent , to terminate his contract.
5. He lodged this claim against the respondent , asking the Court to find that termination was unfair, and to grant him an order of reinstatement, or compensation for unfair termination, among other prayers.
6. He had an outstanding staff housing loan, at the time of termination.
7. He defaulted on repayment after he lost his job. Consequently, the respondent demanded repayment of the full amount, failing which the respondent would sell by way of auction, the claim ant ’s charge property, registration Kapsabet / Kapsabet Block 4[ Lemook‘A’] 35.
8. He filed an application under Certificate of Urgency, dated 16th December 2022, asking the Court issue orders: -a.Restraining the respondent from proceeding with the sale of his piece of land.b.Compelling the respondent to reverse from charging him commercial rate of interest on his staff housing loan, to staff rate of interest.c.Restraining the respondent from demanding further loan repayment, until the claim is heard and determined.
9. The respondent filed a replying affidavit sworn by its Legal Manager, Duncan Matisero, on January 12, 2023.
10. Parties agreed to have the application considered and determined by way of written submissions, which they confirmed to have filed and exchanged at the last mention, on April 17, 2023.
The Court Finds: - 11. The claim ant is a resident of Kapsabet, in the Rift Valley Region. His P.O. Box Number is 216-30301 Kapsabet.
12. At paragraph 7 of his Statement of claim , he states that he was working at Nakuru East Branch, at the time of termination, 17th February 2020.
13. There is no reason therefore, why he filed his claim at Nairobi. He ought to have filed his claim either at Nakuru, or at Eldoret, near his hometown of Kapsabet.
14. The court shall therefore defer making a Ruling on the application dated December 16, 2022, and direct: -a.The claim is transferred to the Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nakuru.b.The application dated December 16, 2022shall be placed before the court at Nakuru, on an accelerated basis, for further directions.
DATED, SIGNED AND RELEASED TO THE PARTIES VIA E-MAIL, AT NAIROBI, UNDER PRACTICE DIRECTION NO. 6 [2] OF THE ELECTRONIC CASE MANAGEMENT PRACTICE DIRECTIONS, 2020, THIS 31ST DAY OF MAY 2023. James RikaJudge