[2016] KEELC 1025 (KLR)

[2016] KEELC 1025 (KLR)

The court found that the defendants were duly served with the court order issued on 29th January, 2013, and willfully disobeyed it by proceeding to bury a body on the suit land in direct contravention of the order. The court held that such conduct amounted to flagrant contempt and undermined the authority and...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2016] KEELC 1025 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Judah K. M'Mbijiwe M'Rukaria; Respondent: Cecilia Kiruja; Respondent: Kiriinya Kiruja
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Meru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 35 of 2013
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Contempt Application
Outcome
Application allowed in part; 2nd defendant found in contempt and sentenced to six months imprisonment; 1st defendant spared punishment.
Legal Topics
Contempt of Court, Enforcement of Court Orders, Land Disputes
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Contempt of Court Enforcement of Court Orders Land Disputes

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Judah K. M'Mbijiwe M'Rukaria

Applicant

Cecilia Kiruja

Respondent

Kiriinya Kiruja

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Contempt Application

  1. 1 Whether the defendants disobeyed the court order issued on 29th January, 2013.
  2. 2 Whether the 2nd defendant should be punished for contempt of court.
  3. 3 Whether the 1st defendant should also be punished for contempt.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the defendants were duly served with the court order issued on 29th January, 2013, and willfully disobeyed it by proceeding to bury a body on the suit land in direct contravention of the order. The court held that such conduct amounted to flagrant contempt and undermined the authority and integrity of the court. However, considering the advanced age of the 1st defendant and the likelihood that she was misled by the 2nd defendant, the court exercised its discretion to spare her from punishment. The 2nd defendant, identified as the principal actor in the contempt, was found deserving of punishment, and the court ordered his arrest and detention for six months to enforce...

Court Disposition

Application allowed in part; 2nd defendant found in contempt and sentenced to six months imprisonment; 1st defendant spared punishment.

Orders

  • An order is issued for the arrest and detention in prison for a term of six months against the 2nd Defendant Kiriinya Kiruja for disobeying the court order issued on 29/01/2013.
  • The order to arrest and detain the 2nd Defendant Kiriinya Kiruja to be served upon the O.C.S Subuiga Police Station for enforcement.