[2021] KEHC 2646 (KLR)
The court held that a police abstract, which contains details of the insurance policy, is sufficient evidence to establish the existence of a contract of insurance for the purposes of enforcing a judgment against an insurer. The trial court erred in requiring the appellant to produce a certificate of insurance, as...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2021] KEHC 2646 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Judith Anyango; Respondent: Invesco Assurance Limited
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kakamega
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Appeal 172 of 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Judges
- DN Musyoka
- Legal Topics
- Declaratory Orders, Burden of Proof, Insurance Contracts
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Judith Anyango
Appellant
Invesco Assurance Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a police abstract is sufficient evidence to prove the existence of a contract of insurance for purposes of enforcing a judgment against an insurer.
- 2 Whether a certificate of insurance is the only acceptable proof of an insurance contract in such circumstances.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that a police abstract, which contains details of the insurance policy, is sufficient evidence to establish the existence of a contract of insurance for the purposes of enforcing a judgment against an insurer. The trial court erred in requiring the appellant to produce a certificate of insurance, as the appellant, being a third party, was not privy to the insurance contract and could not reasonably be expected to have access to such a document. The burden of proof shifted to the insurer once the appellant produced the police abstract, and the respondent failed to discharge that burden. Accordingly, the dismissal of the appellant's suit by the trial court was set aside and...
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- The order dismissing Kakamega CMCCC No. 312 of 2017 is set aside.
- The suit is allowed in terms of prayers (a), (b), and (c) of the plaint dated 7th July 2017.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
18 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KAKAMEGA
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 172 OF 2018
(An appeal arising from the judgment and decree of the Hon. W. Lopokoiyit,
Resident Magistrate (RM), in Kakamega CMCCC No. 312 of 2017, of 29th November 2018)
JUDITH ANYANGO............................................................APPELLANT
VERSUS
INVESCO ASSURANCE LIMITED..............................RESPONDENT
JUDGMENT
1. The suit at the trial court was initiated by the appellant herein against the respondent, for a declaratory order that the respondent, who had insured the accident vehicle in Kakamega CMCCC No. 203 of 2014, in favour of one Bernard Kariuki, was bound to satisfy the decree of the court made in that suit, to the tune of Kshs. 355, 643. 00. At the trial, the appellant produced a police abstract to support his case, saying that the same bore a policy number, which was evidence that the accident vehicle had been covered by the respondent.
2. In the end, the trial court made a finding, that the only document that could prove existence of a contract of insurance was a certificate of insurance, and that since such evidnce was not brought forth, the case by the appellant had failed, and was dismissed. The appeal before me arose from that finding.
3. The appeal herein turns on only one issue, whether a police abstract can prove existence of a contract of insurance, or, put differently, whether the certificate of insurance was the only way to establish liability on the part of an insurer.
4. It was held, in APA Insurance Co. Ltd vs. George Masele [2014] eKLR (Mabeya J), that a police abstract was good enough, as evidence that there had been a policy of insurance in force, and that it was unreasonable to expect the injured victim to produce a certificate of insurance, given that he was not privy to the contract between the insured and the insurer, and that the details, as captured in the police abstract, are from the certificate of insurance affixed to a motor vehicle or supplied by the insured.
5. I agree entirely with APA Insurance Co. Ltd vs. George Masele [2014] eKLR (Mabeya J). The trial court need not have looked further than from the police abstract. The appellant had established on a balance, from the police abstract, that there was a valid insurance policy in force, and the burden shifted to the respondent to prove otherwise. See also Martin Onyango vs. Invesco Asurance Company Limited [2015] eKLR (Majanja J).
6. Consequently, it is my finding that the appeal herein has merit, and I hereby find in favour of the appellant. The order made, in Kakamega CMCCC No. 312 of 2017, dismissing the said suit, is hereby substituted with an order allowing the same in terms of prayers (a), (b) and (c) of the plaint, dated 7th July 2017. The appeal herein is allowed in those terms.
DELIVERED DATED AND SIGNED IN OPEN COURT AT KAKAMEGA THIS 29TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2021
W. MUSYOKA
JUDGE