[2020] KEHC 6397 (KLR)

[2020] KEHC 6397 (KLR)

The court found that the application for leave to institute judicial review proceedings had already been certified as urgent and that, in light of the COVID-19 pandemic and the relevant Practice Directions, both the Notice of Motion dated 6th April 2020 and the Chamber Summons dated 27th February 2020 should be...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2020] KEHC 6397 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Judy Wairimu Mirango; Respondent: Non-Governmental Organizations Co-ordination Board; Respondent: Association for the Physically Disabled in Kenya
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Judicial Review Miscellaneous Application 58 of 2020
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Directions and Certification of Urgency
Outcome
Application certified as urgent; directions issued for hearing and service; no final determination on merits.
Judges
P Nyamweya
Legal Topics
Judicial Review Procedure, Leave to Apply for Judicial Review, Certiorari and Prohibition, Urgency and Interlocutory Orders
Source Language
en
Administrative Law Civil Procedure Judicial Review Procedure Leave to Apply for Judicial Review Certiorari and Prohibition Urgency and Interlocutory Orders

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Judy Wairimu Mirango

Applicant

Non-Governmental Organizations Co-ordination Board

Respondent

Association for the Physically Disabled in Kenya

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Directions and Certification of Urgency

  1. 1 Whether the application for leave to institute judicial review proceedings should be certified as urgent and admitted for hearing on a priority basis.
  2. 2 Whether section 19 of the Non-Governmental Organizations Co-ordination Act applies to the dispute.
  3. 3 Whether the applications should be heard together and by way of written submissions in light of COVID-19 practice directions.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the application for leave to institute judicial review proceedings had already been certified as urgent and that, in light of the COVID-19 pandemic and the relevant Practice Directions, both the Notice of Motion dated 6th April 2020 and the Chamber Summons dated 27th February 2020 should be heard together by way of written submissions. The court further held that the issue of the applicability of section 19 of the Non-Governmental Organizations Co-ordination Act would be determined after an inter partes hearing. The court issued directions for service, filing of replies, and submission of electronic copies of pleadings, emphasizing compliance with Ministry of Health...

Court Disposition

Application certified as urgent; directions issued for hearing and service; no final determination on merits.

Orders

  • The Notice of Motion application dated 6th April 2020 is certified as urgent and admitted for hearing on a priority basis.
  • The Notice of Motion dated 6th April 2020 and Chamber Summons dated 27th February 2020 shall be heard and determined together by way of written submissions.