[2017] KEHC 8622 (KLR)
The court found that the applicants are persons interested in the estate of Waithaka Peter Keru, as they claim entitlement through their late father, for whom the deceased allegedly held land in trust. No letters of administration had been taken out in respect of the estate, and there were allegations of improper...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2017] KEHC 8622 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Judy Wambui Kinyanjui; Applicant: Peninah Wanjiku; Applicant: Alice Nyakianda; Applicant: Catherine Mbaire Kinyanjui; Applicant: Irene Waringa; Applicant: Lydia Muthoni Ng’ang’a; Applicant: Kennedy Kimando Kinyanjui; Respondent: Teresa Wanjiku Waithaka; Respondent: James Kariuki Kinyanjui; Respondent: David Waithaka Kinyanjui; Respondent: Stephen Thuo Kinyanjui; Respondent: Josphat Kariuki; Respondent: Peter Kimani
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Succession Cause 2127 of 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Succession Cause / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Preservation Orders
- Outcome
- Preservation orders granted; direction to petition for grant of letters of administration issued.
- Judges
- AO Muchelule
- Legal Topics
- Succession of Estates, Grant of Letters of Administration, Preservation of Estate, Trusts in Land, Fraudulent Transfer of Property
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Judy Wambui Kinyanjui
Applicant
Peninah Wanjiku
Applicant
Alice Nyakianda
Applicant
Catherine Mbaire Kinyanjui
Applicant
Irene Waringa
Applicant
Lydia Muthoni Ng’ang’a
Applicant
Kennedy Kimando Kinyanjui
Applicant
Teresa Wanjiku Waithaka
Respondent
James Kariuki Kinyanjui
Respondent
David Waithaka Kinyanjui
Respondent
Stephen Thuo Kinyanjui
Respondent
Josphat Kariuki
Respondent
Peter Kimani
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Preservation Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants, as children of Stanley Kinyanjui Kiru, have a legitimate interest in the estate of Waithaka Peter Keru.
- 2 Whether the estate of the deceased should be preserved pending the determination of the citation and grant of letters of administration.
- 3 Whether the respondents fraudulently transferred portions of the estate after the death of the deceased.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicants are persons interested in the estate of Waithaka Peter Keru, as they claim entitlement through their late father, for whom the deceased allegedly held land in trust. No letters of administration had been taken out in respect of the estate, and there were allegations of improper transfers after the deceased's death. Regardless of the ultimate merit of the applicants' claims, the court held that it was necessary to protect and preserve the estate to prevent further alienation or interference until a proper petition for grant of letters of administration is filed and the applicants' interests can be formally lodged and adjudicated. The court therefore...
Court Disposition
Preservation orders granted; direction to petition for grant of letters of administration issued.
Orders
- The 1st respondent Teresa Wanjiku Waithaka shall petition the court for grant of letters of administration intestate in respect of the estate of Waithaka Peter Keru within 60 days from the date of the ruling.
- If the 1st respondent fails to do so, the 1st applicant Judy Wambui Kinyanjui shall be at liberty to petition for the grant.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
42 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
FAMILY DIVISION
SUCCESSION CAUSE NO. 2127 OF 2015
IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF PETER WAITHAKA KERU (DECEASED)
JUDY WAMBUI KINYANJUI………………….....…..…1ST APPLICANT
PENINAH WANJIKU …………………………....…..…2ND APPLICANT
ALICE NYAKIANDA…………………………….........…3RD APPLICANT
CATHERINE MBAIRE KINYANJUI………………......…4TH APPLICANT
IRENE WARINGA…………………………………..........5TH APPLICANT
LYDIA MUTHONI NG’ANG’A……………………...….....6TH APPLICANT
KENNEDY KIMANDO KINYANJUI……………….......…7TH APPLICANT
VERSUS
TERESA WANJIKU WAITHAKA……………….…....1ST RESPONDENT
JAMES KARIUKI KINYANJUI………………….……2ND RESPONDENT
DAVID WAITHAKA KINYANJUI……………….….…3RD RESPONDENT
STEPHEN THUO KINYANJUI…………………......…4TH RESPONDENT
JOSPHAT KARIUKI………………………….…….....5TH RESPONDENT
PETER KIMANI……………………………………….6TH RESPONDENT
RULING
1. The applicant Judy Wambui Kinyanjui, Peninah Wanjiku, Alice Nyakianda, Catherine Mbaire, Irene Waringa, Lydia Muthoni Ng’ang’a and Kennedy Kimando Kinyanjui are the children of the deceased Stanley Kinyanjui Kiru who died on 30th January 2014. The deceased was the younger brother of Waithaka Peter Keru who is the subject of this application and who died on 27th June 2013. There is a parcel of land number Ndumberi/Ndumberi/1891 which was in the name of the deceased Waithaka Peter Keru who is the subject of this application and who died on 27th June 2013. There is a parcel of land number Ndumberi/Ndumberi/1891 which was registered in the name of the deceased Waithaka Peter Keru to hold in trust for himself and for his brother Stanley Kinyanjui Kiru in equal shares. Before he (Waithaka) died he subdivided the land into 12 portions as follows:- 3210, 3211, 3212, 3213, 3214, 3215, 3216, 3217, 3218, 3219, 3220 and 3221. According to the applicants, the portions were to be shared among the 12 beneficiaries of his father. He signed the transfer forms but before he had obtained the consent of the Land Control Board he fell sick and subsequently died. The applicants state that the respondents (1st respondent Teresa Wanjiku Waithaka was the wife of Waithaka Peter Keru) conspired with the local administration and the lands office and caused some of the parcels to be registered in the names of Josephat Kariuki Kaguru (5th respondent), Peter Kimani Kinyanjui (6th respondent), James Kariuki Kinyanjui (2nd respondent), David Waithaka Kinyanjui (3rd respondent), and Stephen Thuo Kinyanjui (4th respondent).
2. According to the 3rd respondent (who swore a replying affidavit on his behalf and on behalf of the other respondents), the subdivision of parcel 1891 was done in 2005 following agreement between the two deceased. The 12 brothers went to the children of his (David’s ) father Stanley Kinyanjui Kiru. The distribution was as follows:-
(a) David Waithaka – 3221
(b) James Kairuki – 3220
(c) Stephen Thuo – 3219
(d) Kennedy Kimando – 3218
(e) Judy Wambui – 3217
(f) Florence Wambui – 3216
(g) Stephen Thuo – 3215
(h) James Kairuki – 3214
(i) David Waithaka – 3213
(j) Kennedy Kimando – 3212
(k) Peter Kimani – 3211
(l) Josphat Kariuki – 3210
Each took possession of the respective parcel. Before the two brothers died, they had commenced the process of transfer. They went to the Land Control Board and obtained consent, and had transferred some of the portions to the respective beneficiaries.
3. The applicants’ case is that the transfers were fraudulently done after the death of their father and uncle. This is denied by the respondents.
4. On 26th August 2015 the applicants filed this motion seeking that there be orders preserving the estate of the deceased Waithaka Peter Keru so that it should not be sold, transferred, alienated, developed, trespassed on or in any other way interfered with pending the hearing and determination of the citation. The citation was filed where with the motion by the 1st applicant.The citation stated that the 1st respondent is the widow of the deceased; that the deceased leaving property in respect of which the applicants (as the children of the deceased Stanley Kinyanjui Kiru) were entitled; that the respondents should petition the court for the grant of letters of administration intestate, failing which the applicants be allowed to seek such letters. The motion was brought to preserve the estate in the meantime. According to “JWK5”, parcels 3218, 3217, 3220 and 3216 are the portions of Ndumberi/Ndumberi/1891 that are still registered in the name of the deceased Waithaka Peter Keru.
5. The foregoing shows that the applicants are persons interested in the estate of the deceased Waithaka Peter Keru. No letters have been taken out in respect of the estate of the deceased. The applicants have made claims that, in the past, the respondents have had some of the estate of the deceased transferred to themselves and/or other people after the death of the deceased and before any grant. The merit of these claims aside, there is need to protect and preserve the estate until such time that a petition has been filed in which the interests of the applicants can be lodged, heard and determined.
6. In conclusion, in the wider interests of justice, and in order to expedite the matter, I direct the 1st respondent Teresa Wanjiku Waithaka to petition the court for the grant of letters of administration intestate in respect of the estate of her late husband Waithaka Peter Keru within 60 days from today, failing which the 1st applicant Judy Wambui Kinyanjui shall be at liberty to petition. Until the petition has been filed and the applicants have therein lodged their claim to the estate, I make an order that parcels Ndumberi/Ndumberi/3218, 3217, 3220 and 3216 shall not be sold, transferred and/or in any other manner alienated. I make no order as to costs.
DATED and DELIVERED at NAIROBI this 23RD FEBRUARY 2017
A.O. MUCHELULE
JUDGE