[2015] KEHC 4449 (KLR)
The court found that the judgment convicting the appellant was written and signed by a magistrate who had already been declared unfit to serve by the Judges and Magistrates Vetting Board. As a result, the judgment was a nullity and void ab initio. The State conceded this fact, and the court determined that the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2015] KEHC 4449 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Judy Waruguru Kagai; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kerugoya
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Appeal 12 of 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; conviction quashed; sentence set aside; retrial ordered.
- Judges
- BB Limo
- Legal Topics
- Stealing by Servant, Defective Charge Sheet, Judicial Officer Vetting, Mistrial, Retrial Procedure
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Judy Waruguru Kagai
Appellant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a judgment written and signed by a magistrate declared unfit by the Judges and Magistrates Vetting Board is a nullity.
- 2 Whether the charge sheet was defective due to misdescription of the complainant entity.
- 3 Whether the prosecution proved its case beyond reasonable doubt.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the judgment convicting the appellant was written and signed by a magistrate who had already been declared unfit to serve by the Judges and Magistrates Vetting Board. As a result, the judgment was a nullity and void ab initio. The State conceded this fact, and the court determined that the interests of justice required the conviction to be quashed and the sentence set aside. The court exercised its powers under Section 354(3)(1)(a) of the Criminal Procedure Code to allow the appeal, reverse the conviction, set aside the sentence, and order a retrial before a competent magistrate at Wanguru Law Courts. The appellant was discharged pending retrial, and the matter was...
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; conviction quashed; sentence set aside; retrial ordered.
Orders
- The appeal is allowed.
- The conviction of the appellant is reversed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
40 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KERUGOYA
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 12 OF 2014
JUDY WARUGURU KAGAI………………………..………….APPELLANT
-VERSUS-
REPUBLIC………………….....……….……………............RESPONDENT
(An appeal from the judgment of the Principal Magistrate’s
Court (T. Mwangi) at Wanguru, Criminal Case No. 735 of 2011
dated 16th June, 2014)
JUDGMENT
JUDY WARUGURU KAGAI the appellant herein was charged vide Principal Magistrate’s Court Criminal Case No. 735 of 2011at Wanguru Law Courts with stealing by servant contrary to Section 281 of the Penal Code. The particulars of the charge were that on 1st October, 2011 at Ngurubani Township Kirinyaga County being an employee of Mwea Rice Growers Society, she stole Ksh.6,000 from the society which came to her possession by virtue of her employment. After the trial the Appellant was found guilty and convicted and as a result sentenced to serve three (3) years in jail. She was aggrieved by both conviction and sentence and preferred this appeal.
The Appellant raised 4 grounds of appeal in the amended petition which are as follows:
The learned trial magistrate erred both in law and fact in that:-
She wrote and signed the judgment on 7th March, 2014 whenshe had been declared by the judges & Magistrates Vetting Board as being unfit to continue serving as a magistrate on 31st January, 2014. The judgment was therefore before the eyes of the law a nullity, void, abinitio & without any legal basis whatsoever.
The learned trial magistrate failed to appreciate that sincethe complainant was MWEA RICE FARMER SACCO TEBERE according to the charge sheet, the charge sheet was defective as the appellant had never been at anyone time been a servant and/or employee of such an entity BUT was at one time a servant and/or employee only of MWEA RICE FARMERS SACCO SOCIETY LTD – the two entities in law are not synonymous.
She failed to appreciate that there were glaring gaps in theprosecution case & it could not at all be said that the prosecution proved its case against the appellant beyond any shadow of doubt or at all to secure a conviction – as required in all criminal cases.
The conduct of the trial by two different magistrates, thereading/delivery of judgment by another (3rd one) and the glaring non observance of basic issues of law & criminal procedure renders the entire case a MISTRIAL hence a nullity.
The main gist of this appeal in my view is hinged on the 1st ground which is the fact that the judgment appeared to have been written and signed by Hon. T. Mwangi, a principal magistrate on 7th March, 2014 after she had been declared unfit to act as a judicial officer by Judges and Magistrates Vetting Board on 31st January, 2014.
The State, through the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions through Mr. Sitati conceded to that fact. The appeal in my view and in the light of the circumstances obtaining is uncontested and there is no need of going into the merits of the other grounds raised.
I have considered the sentiments and/or submissions made by Mr. Njuguna for the Appellant and the submissions made by Sitati and I have come to the conclusion that the interests of justice will be served if the matter is referred back to the subordinate court for retrial before any of the magistrates sitting in Wanguru Law Courts at the moment.
Consequently under the powers conferred to this Court under the Section354 (3) (1) (a)of the Criminal Procedure Code, I will allow this appeal. The conviction of the Appellant is hereby reversed and the sentence set aside. She stands discharged but I shall order that she will now be retried afresh by another court of competent jurisdiction at Wanguru Law Courts. It is so ordered.
Dated and delivered at Kerugoya this 23rd day of June, 2015.
R. K. LIMO
JUDGE
23. 6.2015
Before Hon. Justice R. Limo
Court Assistant: Willy Mwangi
Appellant present
Nyambura holding brief for Kariuki for appellant.
Omayo for State present
COURT: Judgment signed, dated and delivered in the open court in the presence of Nyambura holding brief for Kariuki for the Appellant and Omayo for State.
R. K. LIMO
JUDGE
23. 6.2015
MR. OMAYO: We pray for a mention date when the accused will appear at Wanguru Law Courts for purposes of fresh trial.
NYAMBURA:We pray for 25th June, 2015.
COURT: The accused shall appear at Wanguru Law Courts on 25th June, 2015 but shall first pass by the office of prosecution Wanguru for purposes of fresh trial. The accused may be released on bond on same terms she has been.
R. K. LIMO
JUDGE
23. 6.2015