[2019] KEELC 1726 (KLR)

[2019] KEELC 1726 (KLR)

The court held that documents annexed by the 1st defendant through submissions constituted new evidence and could not be admitted at that stage of proceedings. The court agreed with the applicant's counsel that such documents must be expunged to preserve the integrity of the trial process and ensure that all parties...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEELC 1726 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Julia Mugure (suing as the administratrix of the estate of the late Wilfred Njagi Kiragu – Deceased); Respondent: Benjamin Collins Mati; Respondent: Gerrad Nyagi Wilson
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Chuka
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 14 of 2018
Procedural Posture
Originating Summons / Ruling on Admissibility of Documents and Directions for Judgment
Outcome
Documents annexed by the 1st defendant through submissions are expunged; directions given for filing of submissions and delivery of judgment.
Judges
FM Njoroge
Legal Topics
Adverse Possession, Land Registration, Limitation of Actions, Expunging Evidence
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Adverse Possession Land Registration Limitation of Actions Expunging Evidence

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Julia Mugure (suing as the administratrix of the estate of the late Wilfred Njagi Kiragu – Deceased)

Applicant

Benjamin Collins Mati

Respondent

Gerrad Nyagi Wilson

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Originating Summons / Ruling on Admissibility of Documents and Directions for Judgment

  1. 1 Whether documents annexed by the 1st defendant through submissions can be admitted as evidence.
  2. 2 Whether the doctrine of adverse possession entitles the applicant to registration of 1.00 acre out of LR: MAGUMONI/MUKUUNI/303.
  3. 3 Whether the expunged documents affect the outcome of the originating summons.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that documents annexed by the 1st defendant through submissions constituted new evidence and could not be admitted at that stage of proceedings. The court agreed with the applicant's counsel that such documents must be expunged to preserve the integrity of the trial process and ensure that all parties have a fair opportunity to respond to evidence. The ruling applied not only to the present case but also to related matters (ELC 10, 11, 12, 13, and 14 of 2018) where similar attempts to introduce new evidence through submissions had occurred. The court directed parties to file soft copies of their written submissions within seven days and fixed the date for delivery of...

Court Disposition

Documents annexed by the 1st defendant through submissions are expunged; directions given for filing of submissions and delivery of judgment.

Orders

  • Annextures 11 to 14 filed by the 1st defendant through submissions are hereby expunged from the record.
  • The same documents, if filed in ELC Numbers 11, 12, 13, and 14, are also expunged.