[2013] KEHC 950 (KLR)

[2013] KEHC 950 (KLR)

The court found that it was necessary to preserve the suit property and prevent any party from altering its status or interfering with the occupation of the land pending the hearing and determination of the suit. The court exercised its discretion to grant an order of inhibition against the suit property, including...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2013] KEHC 950 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Julius Gatobu Magiri & 4 Others; Defendant: Patrick Murigu
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Meru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 6 of 2012
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Inhibition and Injunction
Outcome
interlocutory orders granted in part
Judges
FM Njoroge
Legal Topics
Interlocutory Injunctions, Inhibition Orders, Status Quo Orders, Land Disputes
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Interlocutory Injunctions Inhibition Orders Status Quo Orders Land Disputes

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Julius Gatobu Magiri & 4 Others

Plaintiff

Patrick Murigu

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Inhibition and Injunction

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiffs are entitled to an order of inhibition against the suit property pending determination of the suit.
  2. 2 Whether a temporary injunction restraining the defendant from interfering or evicting the plaintiffs from the suit land should be granted.
  3. 3 Whether the status quo should be maintained pending the hearing and determination of the suit.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that it was necessary to preserve the suit property and prevent any party from altering its status or interfering with the occupation of the land pending the hearing and determination of the suit. The court exercised its discretion to grant an order of inhibition against the suit property, including its subdivisions, and directed that the status quo be maintained, meaning that the parties should remain as they are on the land, non-occupying parties should not move in, and no new developments should be undertaken. The court deemed these measures necessary to protect the interests of all parties and ensure that the subject matter of the dispute is preserved until the...

Court Disposition

interlocutory orders granted in part

Orders

  • Status quo to be maintained: parties to remain as they are on the suit land; non-occupying parties not to move in; no new developments until suit is heard and determined.
  • Order of inhibition to be registered against L.R. No. NKUENE/U-MIKUMBUNE/84 and its subdivisions (NKUENE/U-MIKUMBUNE/1724 to 1728) pending hearing of the suit.