[1996] KECA 20 (KLR)

[1996] KECA 20 (KLR)

The Court held that the failure to include exhibits and other documents put in evidence at the hearing in the record of appeal is a contravention of rule 85(1)(f) of the Court of Appeal Rules. This omission renders the appeal defective and fatally incompetent, warranting the striking out of the appeal.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[1996] KECA 20 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Julius Kanyingi Mwangi; Respondent: Stanley Kihara Muchunga
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Appeal 69 of 1994
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Order Striking Out Appeal for Non Compliance With Rules
Outcome
appeal struck out as incompetent
Judges
GS Pall
Legal Topics
Appeal Record Requirements, Striking Out Appeal, Court of Appeal Rules
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Appeal Record Requirements Striking Out Appeal Court of Appeal Rules

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Julius Kanyingi Mwangi

Appellant

Stanley Kihara Muchunga

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Order Striking Out Appeal for Non Compliance With Rules

  1. 1 Whether the omission of exhibits and documents from the record of appeal renders the appeal fatally defective.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court held that the failure to include exhibits and other documents put in evidence at the hearing in the record of appeal is a contravention of rule 85(1)(f) of the Court of Appeal Rules. This omission renders the appeal defective and fatally incompetent, warranting the striking out of the appeal.

Court Disposition

appeal struck out as incompetent

Orders

  • The appeal is hereby ordered struck-out.
  • No order as to costs.