[2013] KECA 512 (KLR)

[2013] KECA 512 (KLR)

The Court found that the respondents were duly notified that the proceedings and judgment were ready for collection on 14th September, 2012, and were required under Rule 82(1) of the Court of Appeal Rules to file the record of appeal within 60 days. The respondents failed to file the record of appeal within the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2013] KECA 512 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Julius Kiruma Kariuki; Respondent: Nahashon Mwangi Mbogo; Respondent: Peter Githinji; Respondent: The Attorney General
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Nyeri
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Application 321 of 2012
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Application to Strike Out Notice of Appeal
Outcome
Application allowed. Notice of Appeal struck out. Costs awarded to the applicant.
Legal Topics
Appeals Process, Striking Out Notice, Court of Appeal Rules, Record of Appeal Filing, Service of Process
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Appeals Process Striking Out Notice Court of Appeal Rules Record of Appeal Filing Service of Process

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Julius Kiruma Kariuki

Applicant

Nahashon Mwangi Mbogo

Respondent

Peter Githinji

Respondent

The Attorney General

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Application / Application to Strike Out Notice of Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the respondents failed to take essential steps to file the record of appeal within the prescribed time under Rule 82(1) of the Court of Appeal Rules.
  2. 2 Whether the Notice of Appeal should be struck out for failure to comply with procedural requirements.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court found that the respondents were duly notified that the proceedings and judgment were ready for collection on 14th September, 2012, and were required under Rule 82(1) of the Court of Appeal Rules to file the record of appeal within 60 days. The respondents failed to file the record of appeal within the prescribed period and did not provide any explanation for their failure to comply with the procedural requirements. The matters stated in the supporting affidavit were uncontroverted, and the respondents did not attend court or file any response. Consequently, the Court allowed the application and struck out the Notice of Appeal pursuant to Rule 84 of the Court of Appeal Rules,...

Court Disposition

Application allowed. Notice of Appeal struck out. Costs awarded to the applicant.

Orders

  • The Notice of Appeal filed on 22nd June, 2009 is struck out pursuant to Rule 84 of the Court of Appeal Rules.
  • The applicant shall have the costs of the application.