[2014] KEHC 7623 (KLR)
The court found that the plaintiff's application for a temporary injunction was unopposed and that the plaintiff had established sufficient grounds for the grant of the order sought. The court considered the threat of communication to the plaintiff's employer as potentially causing irreparable harm to the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2014] KEHC 7623 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Julius Kundu; Defendant: Timothy Muriithi
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Case 499 of 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Case / Interlocutory Application for Temporary Injunction
- Outcome
- Temporary injunction granted as prayed, pending disposal of the suit.
- Judges
- DW Mbuteti
- Legal Topics
- Defamation, Interlocutory Injunctions, Right to Privacy
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Julius Kundu
Plaintiff
Timothy Muriithi
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Interlocutory Application for Temporary Injunction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to a temporary injunction restraining the defendant from communicating with the plaintiff's employer based on the allegations in the demand letter.
- 2 Whether the contents of the demand letter constitute defamation or an invasion of privacy.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the plaintiff's application for a temporary injunction was unopposed and that the plaintiff had established sufficient grounds for the grant of the order sought. The court considered the threat of communication to the plaintiff's employer as potentially causing irreparable harm to the plaintiff's employment and reputation. In the absence of any opposition or evidence to the contrary from the defendant, the court exercised its discretion to grant a temporary injunction restraining the defendant from interfering with the plaintiff's employment by communicating the allegations contained in the demand letter to the plaintiff's employer, pending the disposal of the suit.
Court Disposition
Temporary injunction granted as prayed, pending disposal of the suit.
Orders
- A temporary injunction is issued restraining the defendant, his servants, employees, agents, or any other person from interfering with the plaintiff's employment by communicating with the plaintiff's employers based on the allegations contained in the demand letter and any related allegations, pending disposal of...
- Costs of the application shall be in the cause.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
22 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
CIVIL DIVISION
CIVIL CASE NO. 499 OF 2013
JULIUS KUNDU …………..............PLAINTIFF
V E R S U S
TIMOTHY MURIITHI……….............DEFENDANT
R U L I N G
1. The Plaintiff’s suit against the Defendant is founded on the tort of defamation. The publication complained of, however, is novel: it is a letter of demand addressed to the Plaintiff by the Defendant’s advocates to the effect that the Plaintiff has been having a love affair with the Defendant’s wife who is the Plaintiff’s junior at their place of work, a demand that the Plaintiff should desist and accept liability for causing the Defendant emotional distress, etc. under pain of being reported to his employer, and that thereafter the matter can be resolved amicably between the Plaintiff and the Defendant.
2. The Plaintiff has not alleged that the letter of demand was copied to any person or otherwise published to any person other than himself. But that has not stopped him from claiming general and exemplary damages for defamation and an order for an apology.
3. However, it is the threat to report to his employer his alleged love affair with the Defendant’s wife that appears to have alarmed the Plaintiff. He has pleaded that the Defendant’s claim that he has in his possession “details of telephone conversations and text messages” between the Plaintiff and the Defendant’s wife is an invasion of his constitutional right to privacy, and that the threat to report him to his employer is an unlawful endangerment of his employment. In that regard he has sought the relief of permanent injunction to restrain the Defendant from “in any way interfering with (his) employment...by communicating with the Plaintiff’s employers based on the allegations contained in the demand letter and any related allegations”.
4. Together with the plaint the Plaintiff filed notice of motion dated 27th November 2013which is the subject of this ruling. He seeks the main order framed as follows –
“This Honourable Court be pleased to issue AN INJUNCTION directed at the Defendant by himself, his servants, employees and/or agents acting for and on their behalf or any other person whosoever from in any way interfering with the employment of the Plaintiff by communicating with the Plaintiff’s employers based on the allegations contained in the demand letter and any related allegations”.
I will take it that what the Plaintiff seeks is a temporary injunction pending disposal of the suit.
5. The application is brought upon the grounds stated on the face thereof and is supported by the Plaintiff’s affidavit in which he has re-stated his case as pleaded in the plaint. A copy of the demand letter complained of is annexed.
6. The application was served upon Messrs Waiganjo Wachira & Co., the advocates who wrote the letter of demand upon which the suit is founded. They appear to have accepted service. No papers in response to the application have been filed. The copy of the application served had the hearing date endorsed thereon. There was no appearance for the Defendant on 20th January 2014 when the application came up for hearing.
7. As it is then, the application is unopposed. The Plaintiff’s learned counsel canvassed the application by written submissions, which I have considered.
8. I will in the event allow the application and grant a temporary injunction as sought pending disposal of the suit. Costs of the application shall be in the cause. It is so ordered.
DATED AND SIGNED AT NAIROBI THIS 12th DAY OF FEBRUARY 2014
H.P.G. WAWERU
JUDGE
DELIVERED THIS 14TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2014.