[2013] KEHC 1411 (KLR)

[2013] KEHC 1411 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant failed to provide necessary information on his family background to the probation officer, which is a prerequisite for consideration of a community service order. As a result, the applicant was deemed unsuitable for a community service order. Consequently, the sentence of two years...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2013] KEHC 1411 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Julius Mokamba Bosire; Respondent: Republic
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kericho
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Revision 201 of 2013
Procedural Posture
Criminal Revision / Ruling on Revision
Outcome
application for revision dismissed; sentence upheld
Judges
B Ongaya
Legal Topics
Sentencing, Revision of Sentence, Stealing Offences
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Sentencing Revision of Sentence Stealing Offences

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Julius Mokamba Bosire

Applicant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Revision / Ruling on Revision

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is suitable for a community service order instead of imprisonment.
  2. 2 Whether the conviction and sentence imposed by the trial court should be revised.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant failed to provide necessary information on his family background to the probation officer, which is a prerequisite for consideration of a community service order. As a result, the applicant was deemed unsuitable for a community service order. Consequently, the sentence of two years imprisonment imposed by the trial court for the offence of stealing a dwelling house under Section 279(b) of the Penal Code was upheld, and no revision was granted.

Court Disposition

application for revision dismissed; sentence upheld

Orders

  • The applicant is not suitable for a community service order.
  • The sentence of two years imprisonment imposed by the trial court is upheld.