[2002] KEHC 452 (KLR)
The court found that the conviction for assault causing actual bodily harm could not stand because the injuries were not satisfactorily proved and the P3 form was irregularly produced by a witness who was not competent to interpret it, rendering the evidence hearsay and inadmissible. Consequently, the conviction and...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2002] KEHC 452 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Julius Muriuki Ndiguya; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nyeri
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- ? 231 of 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part; conviction and sentence on count 1 quashed; conviction on count 2 upheld; sentence on count 2 substituted with a fine.
- Judges
- JK Mitey
- Legal Topics
- Bodily Harm, Malicious Damage to Property, Admissibility of Evidence, Production of Documents
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Julius Muriuki Ndiguya
Appellant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the conviction for assault causing actual bodily harm was supported by admissible and sufficient evidence.
- 2 Whether the conviction for malicious damage to property was properly sustained.
- 3 Whether the sentence imposed was appropriate given the appellant's status as a first offender.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the conviction for assault causing actual bodily harm could not stand because the injuries were not satisfactorily proved and the P3 form was irregularly produced by a witness who was not competent to interpret it, rendering the evidence hearsay and inadmissible. Consequently, the conviction and sentence on that count were quashed. However, the conviction for malicious damage to property was upheld as the evidence from three prosecution witnesses was consistent and credible. The court also considered the appellant's status as a first offender and substituted the custodial sentence with a fine, with a default custodial term.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part; conviction and sentence on count 1 quashed; conviction on count 2 upheld; sentence on count 2 substituted with a fine.
Orders
- Conviction and sentence on count 1 (assault causing actual bodily harm) quashed and set aside.
- Conviction on count 2 (malicious damage to property) upheld.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
19 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NYERI
HIGH COURT CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 231 OF 2002
(ORG PM’S KRG CR. C. 257/02)
JULIUS MURIUKI NDIGOYA …………………………… APPELLANT
VERSUS
REPUBLIC ………………………………………………... RESPONDENT
JUDGMENT
The appellant JULIUS MURIUKI NDIGUYA was convicted by the principal magistrate Kerugoya on 2 charges:-
1. Apart causing actual bodily him c/s 251 of the Penal Code.
2. Malicious damage to property c/s 339 (1) of the Penal Code.
On the first count he was sentenced to serve twelve (12) months
imprisonment and on the second Count he was sentenced to serve six (6) months imprisonment. The sentences are to run consecutively.
I have perused the proceedings recorded in the lower court. I found that the injuries sustained by the complainant (PW 1) were not conclusively and satisfactorily proved. Apart from stating that the appellant hit him on the head and chest PW 1 did not indicate the injuries he sustained and whether the same were visible tot he naked eye. The medical officer who filed the P3 form did not testify as a prosecution witness. The P3 form was produced by P.C. Paul Muthunia (PW4) of Kerugoya Police Station. No basis was laid for the production of that document by PW 4. He was not then ……….. . It was not indicated that he could interprete the observations noted in the P3 form. He simply produced the document. The production was irregular. The contents of the P3 form became hearsing and were admissible in evidence. Consequently the charge under S. 251 of the Penal Code was not proved. I quash the conviction thereon and set aside the sentence.
As regards the second count there is ample evidence that the appellant tore the complainant’s shirt. The evidence of PW1, PW2 and PW3 was consistent and cogent. The appellant was properly convicted. The trial magistrate rightly rejected the appellants defence in that count. The appellant’s appeal is dismissed in respect to count 2.
On the appeal against sentence, I note that the appellant is on record as a first offender. I allow the appeal against sentence. I set aside the sentence imposed and in its place order that the appellant pays a fine of Kshs.5000/- in default he will serve four (4) months imprisonment.
Dated this 27th day of June 2002.
J.K. MITEY
JUDGE