[2002] KEHC 100 (KLR)

[2002] KEHC 100 (KLR)

The court found that the plaintiff's evidence of breach of contract and resulting damages was uncontested, as the defendant failed to attend the hearing or challenge the plaintiff's testimony. The plaintiff produced documentary evidence supporting the claim, including agreements and a lower court order. The court...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2002] KEHC 100 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Julius Mwova Kyondo; Defendant: William Kea Kashuru
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Mombasa
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Suit 543 of 2000
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Judgment
Outcome
Judgment for the plaintiff.
Legal Topics
Breach of Contract, Special Damages, Contract Enforcement
Source Language
en
Commercial and Corporate Breach of Contract Special Damages Contract Enforcement

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Julius Mwova Kyondo

Plaintiff

William Kea Kashuru

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Suit / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the defendant breached the agreement with the plaintiff.
  2. 2 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to special damages as claimed.
  3. 3 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to interest and costs.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the plaintiff's evidence of breach of contract and resulting damages was uncontested, as the defendant failed to attend the hearing or challenge the plaintiff's testimony. The plaintiff produced documentary evidence supporting the claim, including agreements and a lower court order. The court held that the plaintiff had discharged the burden of proof for the claimed sum, less the amount already paid. Judgment was therefore entered for the plaintiff in the sum of KES 1,295,000 with interest from March 1998 at court rates, subject to deduction of KES 120,000 previously paid. Costs were also awarded to the plaintiff.

Court Disposition

Judgment for the plaintiff.

Orders

  • Judgment entered for the plaintiff against the defendant in the sum of KES 1,295,000 with interest from March 1998 at court rates.
  • The sum of KES 120,000 already paid is to be deducted from the judgment sum.