[2002] KEHC 530 (KLR)

[2002] KEHC 530 (KLR)

The court found that the defendant failed to provide any substantive defence to the plaintiff's claim for KES 120,000, which was based on clear agreements between the parties. The supporting affidavit and annexures established the circumstances of the agreements and the compensation due for the cancellation of the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2002] KEHC 530 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Julius Mwova Kyondo; Defendant: William Kea Kashuru
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Mombasa
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
? 543 of ??
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Ruling on Summary Judgment Application
Outcome
summary judgment for plaintiff, execution stayed pending full judgment and taxation of costs
Legal Topics
Summary Judgment, Tenancy Agreements, Compensation for Termination
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Summary Judgment Tenancy Agreements Compensation for Termination

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Julius Mwova Kyondo

Plaintiff

William Kea Kashuru

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Suit / Ruling on Summary Judgment Application

  1. 1 Whether the defendant has a valid defence to the plaintiff's claim for KES 120,000 under the tenancy agreements.
  2. 2 Whether summary judgment should be entered in favour of the plaintiff for the claimed amount.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the defendant failed to provide any substantive defence to the plaintiff's claim for KES 120,000, which was based on clear agreements between the parties. The supporting affidavit and annexures established the circumstances of the agreements and the compensation due for the cancellation of the tenancy and improvements made by the plaintiff. The defendant's Replying Affidavit did not challenge the validity of the agreements or the amount claimed. The court held that, in the absence of a triable issue or valid defence, summary judgment was appropriate. The court therefore entered judgment for the plaintiff for the sum claimed, with interest and costs, but ordered that...

Court Disposition

summary judgment for plaintiff, execution stayed pending full judgment and taxation of costs

Orders

  • Judgment entered for the plaintiff for KES 120,000 plus interest and costs.
  • Execution of this judgment shall await the full judgment in this suit and the taxation of costs, if any.