[2017] KEHC 7786 (KLR)
The court found that the parties were duly notified to appear and show cause why the suit should not be dismissed for want of prosecution, but neither party attended court on the scheduled date. In accordance with Order 17 Rule 2(1) of the Civil Procedure Rules, the court determined that the failure of the parties...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2017] KEHC 7786 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Julius Njeru Muthamia; Defendant: John Karani; Defendant: Stanle Bundi
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Chuka
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Environment & Land Case 34 of 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Land and Environment Case / Ruling on Dismissal for Want of Prosecution
- Outcome
- suit dismissed for want of prosecution
- Judges
- FM Njoroge
- Legal Topics
- Dismissal for Want of Prosecution, Order 17 Rule 2, Case Management, Land Disputes
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Julius Njeru Muthamia
Plaintiff
John Karani
Defendant
Stanle Bundi
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Land and Environment Case / Ruling on Dismissal for Want of Prosecution
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the suit should be dismissed for want of prosecution under Order 17 Rule 2(1) of the Civil Procedure Rules.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the parties were duly notified to appear and show cause why the suit should not be dismissed for want of prosecution, but neither party attended court on the scheduled date. In accordance with Order 17 Rule 2(1) of the Civil Procedure Rules, the court determined that the failure of the parties to attend and show cause justified the dismissal of the suit for want of prosecution. The court was satisfied that the notice was properly issued and, in the absence of any explanation or action from the parties, the suit could not be allowed to remain pending indefinitely. The overriding objective of the Civil Procedure Rules to facilitate the just, expeditious, proportionate,...
Court Disposition
suit dismissed for want of prosecution
Orders
- The suit is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
20 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT CHUKA
CHUKA ELC CASE NO 34 OF 2017
FORMRLY MERU ELC CASE NO.07 OF 2014
JULIUS NJERU MUTHAMIA..……………..........PLAINTIFF
VERSUS
JOHN KARANI ………………………….....1ST DEFENDANT
STANLE BUNDI………………………...….2ND DEFENDANT
RULING
1. When the parties were to come to court on 21. 2.2017 to show cause why this suit should not be dismissed for want of prosecution in terms of order 17 rule 2(1) of the Civil Procedure Rules, they did not turn up.
2. I am satisfied that the apposite notice was properly issued.
3. I find that the parties have failed to show cause why this suit should not be dismissed for want of prosecution in terms of order 17 rule 2 (1) of the Civil Procedure Rules.
The suit, therefore, merits dismissal.
4. The suit is dismissed.
5. It is so ordered.
Delivered in open court at Chuka this 21st day of February, 2017 in the presence of:
CA: Ndegwa
Parties present
P.M. NJOROGE
JUDGE