[2017] KEELRC 1887 (KLR)

[2017] KEELRC 1887 (KLR)

The court found that the claimant was unfairly dismissed because the termination was not based on a valid or fair reason, as he had been medically certified fit to work. Furthermore, the respondent failed to follow the mandatory procedural requirements under section 41 of the Employment Act, which include explaining...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] KEELRC 1887 (KLR)
Parties
Claimant: Julius Omondi Omedo; Respondent: S.S Mehta & Sons Limited
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Mombasa
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 437 of 2016
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Ex Parte Judgment
Outcome
Judgment for the claimant.
Legal Topics
Unfair Termination, Fixed Term Contracts, Procedural Fairness, Medical Fitness, Compensation for Termination
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Unfair Termination Fixed Term Contracts Procedural Fairness Medical Fitness Compensation for Termination

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Julius Omondi Omedo

Claimant

S.S Mehta & Sons Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Cause / Ex Parte Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the termination of the employment contract was unfair.
  2. 2 Whether the reliefs sought by the claimant should issue.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the claimant was unfairly dismissed because the termination was not based on a valid or fair reason, as he had been medically certified fit to work. Furthermore, the respondent failed to follow the mandatory procedural requirements under section 41 of the Employment Act, which include explaining the reason for termination in a language understood by the employee, in the presence of another employee of his choice, and giving the employee an opportunity to defend himself. The respondent did not contest the claimant's evidence. As a result, the court awarded the claimant compensation equivalent to the salary for the unexpired term of his fixed contract, salary in lieu of...

Court Disposition

Judgment for the claimant.

Orders

  • The claimant is awarded Kshs.306,697 as compensation for unfair termination and salary in lieu of notice.
  • The respondent shall issue a Certificate of Service to the claimant.