[2017] KEHC 7259 (KLR)
The court found that the Land Disputes Tribunal and the Provincial Land Appeals Tribunal acted outside their statutory jurisdiction by purporting to determine issues of title to land, which is not within the scope of section 3(1) of the Land Disputes Tribunal Act No.18 of 1990. As a result, their decisions were...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2017] KEHC 7259 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Julius Wekulo; Applicant: Vincent Wafula; Respondent: Tecla Chemwa; Respondent: Teresa Makokha
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Bungoma
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Application 123 of 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling
- Outcome
- Application allowed. Orders of the Kanduyi Land Disputes Tribunal, the Western Province Land Disputes Appeals Tribunal, and the Bungoma Chief Magistrate's Court set aside.
- Judges
- SN Mukunya
- Legal Topics
- Jurisdiction of Land Disputes Tribunal, Quashing of Tribunal Awards, Title to Land, Certiorari Orders
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Julius Wekulo
Applicant
Vincent Wafula
Applicant
Tecla Chemwa
Respondent
Teresa Makokha
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Land Disputes Tribunal had jurisdiction to determine matters relating to title to land.
- 2 Whether the decisions and awards of the Land Disputes Tribunal and the Provincial Land Appeals Tribunal were null and void for want of jurisdiction.
- 3 Whether the subsequent adoption of the tribunal's award by the Chief Magistrate's Court was valid.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the Land Disputes Tribunal and the Provincial Land Appeals Tribunal acted outside their statutory jurisdiction by purporting to determine issues of title to land, which is not within the scope of section 3(1) of the Land Disputes Tribunal Act No.18 of 1990. As a result, their decisions were nullities and incapable of being adopted or confirmed by the Chief Magistrate's Court. The court quashed and set aside the orders of both tribunals and the subsequent court confirmation, holding that only a court with proper jurisdiction can entertain such claims. No order as to costs was made due to the familial relationship of the parties.
Court Disposition
Application allowed. Orders of the Kanduyi Land Disputes Tribunal, the Western Province Land Disputes Appeals Tribunal, and the Bungoma Chief Magistrate's Court set aside.
Orders
- The orders of the Kanduyi Land Disputes Tribunal are quashed and set aside.
- The confirmation of the tribunal's award by the Bungoma Chief Magistrate's Court is set aside.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
38 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT BUNGOMA
MISC. APPLICATION NO.123 OF 2011
JULIUS WEKULO……………...……..1ST APPLICANT
VINCENT WAFULA………….………..2ND APPLICANT
VERSUS
TECLA CHEMWA……...……….…..1ST RESPONDENT
TERESA MAKOKHA……………….2ND RESPONDENT
RULING
[1] The exparte applicants filed the Notice of motion herein seeking for orders of certiorari to remove into Court and quash the decision of Kakamega Provincial Land Appeals Tribunal was which read and adopted as judgement of the Court on 18/8/2011 in Bungoma CMCC Land Disputes Tribunal Case No.22 of 2007 together with the said adoption.
The exparte applicants state that the Western Provincial Land Disputes Tribunal had no jurisdiction to entertain the claim. The exparte applicants argue that the powers of the Land Disputes Tribunal are clearly set out in the Land Disputes Tribunal Act No.18 of 1990 (now repealed).
That by dint of section 3(1) thereof their powers are limited to division of or determination of boundaries to land and claims to work or occupy land or trespass to land.
That for anything else beyond these issues, the tribunal is not conferred with jurisdiction.
[2] The interested parties in their submissions say that they went to Kanduyi Land Disputes Tribunal claiming 10 acres and 15 acres as their share from their blood brothers the exparte applicants.
That the award was read and adopted as judgement of the Court vide Bungoma Chief Magistrate’s Court on 10/5/2007. They state that this judgement remains undisturbed todate. The respondents argue that though the Provincial Lands Dispute Appeal Tribunal reduced their award from 12 to 6 acres That Tribunals orders may be quashed but the Kanduyi Land Disputes Tribunals order remains undisturbed because it was read and adopted by the Court way back on 10/5/2007.
[3] The jurisdiction of Land Disputes Tribunals is set out in section 3(1) of the Land Disputes Tribunal Act No.18 of 1990. The issue that was before the Kanduyi Lands Dispute Tribunal was the subdivision of E.Bukusu/E. Sangalo/907. The interested party/respondents were claiming 12 acres out of the same. The tribunal awarded them 12 acres out of the same. This was eventually reduced to six acres by the Western Provincial Land Disputes Appeal Tribunal. The claim that was before the two tribunals was subdivision and Title to land. This is not one of the mandates and jurisdiction given to the tribunal by Act 18 of 1990. When the two tribunals purported to deal with title to land they were well out of their jurisdiction.
[4] The issue of Land Disputes Tribunal not having jurisdiction on the issue of title to land is a well beaten truck. The Court of Appeal and the High Court in numerous decisions have said that those Tribunals do not have jurisdiction to entertain Title to land
1. Civil Appeal No.157 of 2001
Asman Maloba Wepukhulu & another -vs- Francis Wakwabubi
Civil Appeal No.80 of 2002
Jonathan Wafula Mbinga -vs- Kalaka Wabwire
Civil Appeal No.47 of 2009
Zebedayo Korosia -vs- Eliud Wepukhulu Khauka and another
[5] When Courts and Tribunals Act without jurisdiction their Actions amount to nothing See;
Owners of motor vessel“Lillian S” v Caltex oil(Kenya)Ltd [1989] KLR 1
When the Kanduyi Land Disputes Tribunal purported to act without jurisdiction its actions amounted to nothing. The subsequent confirmation of its award by the Bungoma Chief Magistrate’s Court was also an act in futility. There was no award that was capable of being confirmed.
The exparte applicants will have to go back and approach the Court with jurisdiction to entertain their claim.
The orders of the Kanduyi Land Disputes Tribunal is quashed and set aside. The subsequent confirmation of that order by the Bungoma Chief Magistrate’s Court is also set aside. Likewise, the decision of the Western Province Land Disputes Appeals Tribunal is also set aside.
The parties are members of the same family.
I will therefore make no order as to costs.
Judgment read in open court.
DATEDand DELIVERED at BUNGOMA this 10th day of March 2017.
S.N. MUKUNYA
JUDGE
In the presence of:
Court Assistants - Chemutai/Joy
Mr. Musumba - For the last Party Applicant
Miss Gachuru - For Lukorito for interested Party