[2017] KEHC 7259 (KLR)

[2017] KEHC 7259 (KLR)

The court found that the Land Disputes Tribunal and the Provincial Land Appeals Tribunal acted outside their statutory jurisdiction by purporting to determine issues of title to land, which is not within the scope of section 3(1) of the Land Disputes Tribunal Act No.18 of 1990. As a result, their decisions were...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] KEHC 7259 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Julius Wekulo; Applicant: Vincent Wafula; Respondent: Tecla Chemwa; Respondent: Teresa Makokha
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Bungoma
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Application 123 of 2011
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling
Outcome
Application allowed. Orders of the Kanduyi Land Disputes Tribunal, the Western Province Land Disputes Appeals Tribunal, and the Bungoma Chief Magistrate's Court set aside.
Judges
SN Mukunya
Legal Topics
Jurisdiction of Land Disputes Tribunal, Quashing of Tribunal Awards, Title to Land, Certiorari Orders
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Jurisdiction of Land Disputes Tribunal Quashing of Tribunal Awards Title to Land Certiorari Orders

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Julius Wekulo

Applicant

Vincent Wafula

Applicant

Tecla Chemwa

Respondent

Teresa Makokha

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling

  1. 1 Whether the Land Disputes Tribunal had jurisdiction to determine matters relating to title to land.
  2. 2 Whether the decisions and awards of the Land Disputes Tribunal and the Provincial Land Appeals Tribunal were null and void for want of jurisdiction.
  3. 3 Whether the subsequent adoption of the tribunal's award by the Chief Magistrate's Court was valid.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the Land Disputes Tribunal and the Provincial Land Appeals Tribunal acted outside their statutory jurisdiction by purporting to determine issues of title to land, which is not within the scope of section 3(1) of the Land Disputes Tribunal Act No.18 of 1990. As a result, their decisions were nullities and incapable of being adopted or confirmed by the Chief Magistrate's Court. The court quashed and set aside the orders of both tribunals and the subsequent court confirmation, holding that only a court with proper jurisdiction can entertain such claims. No order as to costs was made due to the familial relationship of the parties.

Court Disposition

Application allowed. Orders of the Kanduyi Land Disputes Tribunal, the Western Province Land Disputes Appeals Tribunal, and the Bungoma Chief Magistrate's Court set aside.

Orders

  • The orders of the Kanduyi Land Disputes Tribunal are quashed and set aside.
  • The confirmation of the tribunal's award by the Bungoma Chief Magistrate's Court is set aside.