[2020] KEHC 5028 (KLR)
The court found that, although the appellant had a history of assault-related offences and substance abuse, the five-year custodial sentence imposed by the trial court was excessive in light of the reconciliation between the appellant and the complainant, the complainant's express forgiveness and request for...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2020] KEHC 5028 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Juma Ali; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Marsabit
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Appeal 24 of 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- sentence set aside and replaced with period served; appellant to be released unless otherwise lawfully held
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing Principles, Assault Causing Actual Bodily Harm, Plea of Guilty, Mitigation, Victim Offender Reconciliation
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Juma Ali
Appellant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the five-year custodial sentence for assault causing actual bodily harm was harsh and excessive in the circumstances.
- 2 Whether reconciliation between the appellant and complainant and the plea of guilty warranted reduction of sentence.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that, although the appellant had a history of assault-related offences and substance abuse, the five-year custodial sentence imposed by the trial court was excessive in light of the reconciliation between the appellant and the complainant, the complainant's express forgiveness and request for release, and the appellant's plea of guilty which saved judicial time. The court held that these mitigating factors outweighed the aggravating circumstances, and that the period already served in custody was sufficient punishment. Accordingly, the sentence was set aside and replaced with the period already served, and the appellant was ordered to be released unless otherwise lawfully...
Court Disposition
sentence set aside and replaced with period served; appellant to be released unless otherwise lawfully held
Orders
- The five-year imprisonment sentence is set aside and replaced with the period already served.
- The appellant shall be set at liberty unless otherwise lawfully held.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
25 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT MARSABIT
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.24 OF 2019
JUMA ALI ..................................................APPELLANT
VERSUS
REPUBLIC............................................... RESPONDENT
(Being an Appeal from the original conviction and Sentence of Hon. C.A OMBIJA Resident Magistrate Marsabit in Cr. Case No.33 of 2019)
J U D G M E N T
The appellant was charged with the offence of assault causing actual bodily harm Contrary to Section 251 of the Penal Code. The particulars of the offence are that the appellant on the 10th day of January, 2019 at Shauri, Yako Marsabit Central Sub County, unlawfully assaulted Hassan Ali Abdi thereby occasioning him actual bodily harm.
The appellant pleaded guilty to the charge and was convicted on his own plea of guilty and sentenced to serve five (5) years imprisonment. The grounds of appeal are:-
1. That the appellant was arrested charged and convicted in an offence of assault causing actual bodily harm contrary to section 251 of the Penal Code and sentenced to 5 years imprisonment at Marsabit Law Court vide criminal case No.33/2019 dated 19. 2.2019 by Mr. Collins Ombija (RM).
2. That the appellant pleaded guilty of the charge against him and seek mercy and promise never to repeat again.
3. That the appellant is serving sentence without fine and it is too harsh and excessive.
4. That the appellant’s parents are ready to forgive him because they need him and he is ready to integrate with them and support in all means possible.
5. That the appellant has promised never to repeat the same mistake again and is humbly begging the honourable Court to set aside the five (5) years imprisonment and set him at liberty or probation term because the family is ready to receive him.
The appellant relied on his grounds of appeal. The appellant is seeking to have the sentence reduced as it is harsh and excessive. The complainant is his brother and he has forgiven him. The complainant swore an affidavit on 5th February, 2020 stating that he would wish to have the sentence of five (5) years imprisonment set aside and the appellant set at liberty. The affidavit further indicate that the two are brothers and have reconciled. The accused has promised never to repeat the same mistake again. The complainant appeared before me on 11. 03. 2020 and reiterated the contents of the affidavit.
Mr. Ochieng learned prosecution council did not object to the complainant’s plea that the appellant be set at liberty.
The record of the trial Court contains a probation officer’s report dated 19. 2.2019. The report states that the appellant is not married. He smokes bhang and abuses other substances. He harasses his family members including their mother. He has been imprisoned several times for assault related offences involving family members. I believe that is the reason why the trial court imposed the five (5) years custodial sentence.
The facts of the case are that the appellant on the material day arrived home while drunk. He hit the complainant with a stone on the head. The complainant sustained injuries to the scalp and bruises to the shoulder. The injuries were categorized as harm.
In view of the fact that the complainant has reconciled with the appellant and considering that the appellant pleaded guilty to the charge and saved judicial time, I do find that the five years imprisonment sentence is quite excessive. The appellant was arrested on 14. 1.2019 and sentenced on 19. 2.2019. He has served over one (1) year imprisonment sentence. The appeal is not on conviction but on sentence.
Given the circumstances of the case, the five (5) years imprisonment sentence is hereby set aside and replaced with the period already served. The appellant shall be set at liberty unless otherwise lawfully held.
Dated, signed and delivered at Marsabit this 15th day of June 2020.
S. CHITEMBWE
JUDGE