[2023] KEHC 25603 (KLR)

[2023] KEHC 25603 (KLR)

The High Court lacks jurisdiction to review or revise decisions of the Court of Appeal. Entertaining such an application would amount to the High Court sitting as an appellate court over a superior court, which is not permitted by law. The applicant's remedy, if any, does not lie in this court. The application is...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KEHC 25603 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Kennedy Otieno Juma; Respondent: Republic
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kibera
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Criminal Application 007 of 2023
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Revision of Sentence
Outcome
application dismissed
Judges
DR Kavedza
Legal Topics
Jurisdiction of High Court, Revision of Sentence, Robbery With Violence, Abuse of Court Process
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Jurisdiction of High Court Revision of Sentence Robbery With Violence Abuse of Court Process

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kennedy Otieno Juma

Applicant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Revision of Sentence

  1. 1 Does the High Court have jurisdiction to review a decision of the Court of Appeal?
  2. 2 Is the applicant entitled to a revision of his sentence after dismissal of his appeal by the Court of Appeal?
  3. 3 Does the application amount to an abuse of the court process?

Ratio Decidendi

The High Court lacks jurisdiction to review or revise decisions of the Court of Appeal. Entertaining such an application would amount to the High Court sitting as an appellate court over a superior court, which is not permitted by law. The applicant's remedy, if any, does not lie in this court. The application is therefore dismissed for want of jurisdiction and as an abuse of the court process.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The application is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
  • The applicant shall not file any similar application without leave of court.