[2022] KEHC 2289 (KLR)

[2022] KEHC 2289 (KLR)

The court found that the applicants failed to provide any reason for the delay in seeking leave to appeal and did not present any evidence of pauperism to justify waiver of court fees. Furthermore, the application was not supported by a sworn affidavit as required by law. Consequently, the application was found to...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] KEHC 2289 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Justin Otieno Adala; Applicant: Fredrick Omondi Onyango; Respondent: Republic
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Siaya
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Criminal Application E005 of 2022
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal and Waiver of Court Fees
Outcome
application dismissed
Judges
RE Aburili
Legal Topics
Leave to Appeal, Waiver of Court Fees, Criminal Conviction, Murder Offence
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Leave to Appeal Waiver of Court Fees Criminal Conviction Murder Offence

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Justin Otieno Adala

Applicant

Fredrick Omondi Onyango

Applicant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal and Waiver of Court Fees

  1. 1 Whether the applicants have provided sufficient reason for delay in seeking leave to appeal.
  2. 2 Whether the applicants have demonstrated pauperism to warrant waiver of court fees.
  3. 3 Whether the application is properly supported as required by law.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicants failed to provide any reason for the delay in seeking leave to appeal and did not present any evidence of pauperism to justify waiver of court fees. Furthermore, the application was not supported by a sworn affidavit as required by law. Consequently, the application was found to be devoid of merit and was dismissed.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The application for leave to appeal and waiver of court fees is dismissed.
  • File closed.