[2002] KECA 255 (KLR)

[2002] KECA 255 (KLR)

The Court of Appeal held that the High Court lacked jurisdiction to revise an order of acquittal made by a subordinate court under section 202 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The express language of section 364(1)(b) prohibits the High Court from altering or reversing an order of acquittal in revision. Furthermore,...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2002] KECA 255 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Justine Gachoki Ndegwa; Appellant: Paul Njogu Kiberia; Respondent: Republic
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Appeal 20 of 1999
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal From High Court Revision Order
Outcome
appeal allowed; high court revision order set aside
Judges
JE Gicheru, D Ole Keiwua
Legal Topics
Revision Jurisdiction, Acquittal Orders, Magistrates Court Powers, High Court Powers, Appeal Vs Revision, Criminal Procedure Code
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Civil Procedure Revision Jurisdiction Acquittal Orders Magistrates Court Powers High Court Powers Appeal Vs Revision Criminal Procedure Code

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Justine Gachoki Ndegwa

Appellant

Paul Njogu Kiberia

Appellant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal From High Court Revision Order

  1. 1 Whether the High Court had jurisdiction to revise an order of acquittal made by a subordinate court under section 202 of the Criminal Procedure Code.
  2. 2 Whether section 364(1)(b) of the Criminal Procedure Code bars the High Court from revising an order of acquittal.
  3. 3 Whether section 364(5) of the Criminal Procedure Code precludes revision proceedings when an appeal lies but is not brought.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court of Appeal held that the High Court lacked jurisdiction to revise an order of acquittal made by a subordinate court under section 202 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The express language of section 364(1)(b) prohibits the High Court from altering or reversing an order of acquittal in revision. Furthermore, section 364(5) precludes revision proceedings at the instance of a party who could have appealed but did not. The superior court's order setting aside the acquittal was therefore made without jurisdiction and was a nullity. The appeal was allowed and the High Court's order was set aside.

Court Disposition

appeal allowed; high court revision order set aside

Orders

  • The appeal is allowed.
  • The order of the High Court dated 25 September 1998 is set aside.