[2014] KEHC 289 (KLR)

[2014] KEHC 289 (KLR)

The court found that the plaintiffs had filed the suit on 6th July 2012 and had taken no steps to prosecute it for more than two years. The prolonged inactivity amounted to abandonment of the suit. Exercising its inherent powers, the court determined that it was just and proper to dismiss the suit for want of...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2014] KEHC 289 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Justus Kirimi; Plaintiff: Benard Magaju Kimaru; Defendant: Julius Mburugu Rutere
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Meru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 120 B of 2012
Procedural Posture
Land and Environment Case / Ruling on Oral Application for Dismissal for Non Prosecution
Outcome
Suit dismissed for want of prosecution with costs to the defendant.
Judges
FM Njoroge
Legal Topics
Dismissal for Non Prosecution, Inherent Powers of Court, Abandonment of Suit
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Dismissal for Non Prosecution Inherent Powers of Court Abandonment of Suit

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Justus Kirimi

Plaintiff

Benard Magaju Kimaru

Plaintiff

Julius Mburugu Rutere

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Land and Environment Case / Ruling on Oral Application for Dismissal for Non Prosecution

  1. 1 Whether the suit should be dismissed for want of prosecution due to inaction by the plaintiffs.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the plaintiffs had filed the suit on 6th July 2012 and had taken no steps to prosecute it for more than two years. The prolonged inactivity amounted to abandonment of the suit. Exercising its inherent powers, the court determined that it was just and proper to dismiss the suit for want of prosecution, as the plaintiffs had failed to demonstrate any interest in pursuing their claim.

Court Disposition

Suit dismissed for want of prosecution with costs to the defendant.

Orders

  • The suit is dismissed for want of prosecution.
  • Costs awarded to the defendant.