https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc-dr/2026/3

https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc-dr/2026/3

The bill was unopposed, but the court was still obliged to scrutinize it. Applying Schedule 7 of the Advocates (Remuneration) (Amendment) No. 2 Order, 2014 and the principle in Joreth Limited v Kigano & Associates, the value of the subject matter was taken from the pleadings at Kshs.1,911,519.00. The instruction fee...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2026] KEHC-DR 3 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: J.W.WAMBUA & COMPANY ADVOCATES; Respondent: AFRICA MERCHANT ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD
Court
High Court (DR)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Application E1695 of 2025
Procedural Posture
Advocate Client Bill of Costs Taxation / Ruling on Taxation
Outcome
Bill of costs partially allowed and taxed down
Judges
["LA Mumassabba"]
Legal Topics
Advocate Client Bill of Costs, Instruction Fees, Taxation of Costs, Value of Subject Matter, VAT on Taxed Costs
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Advocates' Remuneration Costs Taxation Advocate Client Bill of Costs Instruction Fees Taxation of Costs Value of Subject Matter VAT on Taxed Costs

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 9
Sign in to unlock

Parties

J.W.WAMBUA & COMPANY ADVOCATES

Applicant

AFRICA MERCHANT ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Advocate Client Bill of Costs Taxation / Ruling on Taxation

  1. 1 What is the proper instruction fee for the advocate-client bill of costs
  2. 2 Whether the unopposed bill still required scrutiny by the taxing officer
  3. 3 How the value of the subject matter should be determined for taxation

Ratio Decidendi

The bill was unopposed, but the court was still obliged to scrutinize it. Applying Schedule 7 of the Advocates (Remuneration) (Amendment) No. 2 Order, 2014 and the principle in Joreth Limited v Kigano & Associates, the value of the subject matter was taken from the pleadings at Kshs.1,911,519.00. The instruction fee was accordingly reduced to Kshs.120,000.00, while the remaining items were allowed as drawn, producing a taxed amount of Kshs.257,694.00.

Court Disposition

Bill of costs partially allowed and taxed down

Orders

  • Advocate-Client Bill of Costs dated 28 October 2025 taxed at Kshs.257,694.00
  • Kshs.39,651.00 taxed off from the bill