[2017] KEHC 8434 (KLR)
The court found that the petitioner’s testimony, which was uncontroverted due to the respondent’s non-appearance, established that the respondent was cruel and had deserted the petitioner. The parties had lived apart since 2009, evidencing a total breakdown of the marital relationship. The court was satisfied that...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2017] KEHC 8434 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: K K I; Respondent: J M A
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Judgment Date
- 3 February 2017
- Case Number
- Divorce Cause 204 of 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Divorce Cause / Judgment
- Outcome
- petition allowed; marriage dissolved
- Judges
- DN Musyoka
- Legal Topics
- Divorce, Cruelty, Desertion, Matrimonial Breakdown
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
K K I
Applicant
J M A
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Divorce Cause / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the petitioner has established grounds for dissolution of marriage on the basis of cruelty and desertion.
- 2 Whether the marriage between the petitioner and respondent has irretrievably broken down.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the petitioner’s testimony, which was uncontroverted due to the respondent’s non-appearance, established that the respondent was cruel and had deserted the petitioner. The parties had lived apart since 2009, evidencing a total breakdown of the marital relationship. The court was satisfied that the grounds for dissolution of marriage had been met and that the marriage had irretrievably broken down. Accordingly, the petition for divorce was allowed.
Court Disposition
petition allowed; marriage dissolved
Orders
- The marriage between the petitioner and respondent celebrated on 29th November 2008 is hereby dissolved.
- Decree nisi shall issue forthwith, to be made absolute after thirty (30) days.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment