[2017] KEHC 8821 (KLR)
The court found that the petitioner had proved the ground of cruelty, as the respondent was violent and threatened her life, causing her to leave the matrimonial home. The marriage had irretrievably broken down, with the parties separated since April 2013 and no resumption of cohabitation. The court was satisfied...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2017] KEHC 8821 (KLR)
- Parties
- Petitioner: K K K; Respondent: G K Y
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Mombasa
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Divorce Cause 27 of 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Divorce Cause / Judgment
- Outcome
- Petition allowed. Marriage dissolved.
- Judges
- M Thande
- Legal Topics
- Divorce, Cruelty, Irretrievable Breakdown, Civil Marriage
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
K K K
Petitioner
G K Y
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Divorce Cause / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the petitioner has proved cruelty as a ground for dissolution of marriage.
- 2 Whether the marriage has irretrievably broken down warranting a decree of divorce.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the petitioner had proved the ground of cruelty, as the respondent was violent and threatened her life, causing her to leave the matrimonial home. The marriage had irretrievably broken down, with the parties separated since April 2013 and no resumption of cohabitation. The court was satisfied that the statutory requirements for dissolution of a civil marriage under Section 66(2) of the Marriage Act, 2014, had been met. Accordingly, the court granted a decree of divorce, ordering that the marriage be dissolved.
Court Disposition
Petition allowed. Marriage dissolved.
Orders
- A decree of divorce is pronounced dissolving the marriage between the petitioner and respondent solemnized at the Registrar's Office in Mombasa on 29.8.08.
- Decree nisi to issue and to be made absolute within 1 month.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
29 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MOMBASA
FAMILY DIVISION
DIVORCE CAUSE NO. 27 OF 2016
K K K………………….……....…..PETITIONER
VERSUS
G K Y……………….….……..…RESPONDENT
JUDGMENT
1. K K K the Petitioner herein married G K Y the Respondent herein on 29. 8.08 at the Registrar’s Office in Mombasa.The couple was issued with marriage certificate serial number [particulars withheld] which was produced in Court as proof of the fact of the marriage. The Petitioner is an officer at[particulars withheld] while the Respondent is a prison warder. Following the marriage, the couple cohabited in Kwale. The marriage is not blessed with any children.
2. The Petitioner has filed the Petition herein dated 30. 6.16, seeking the dissolution of her marriage to the Respondent. The ground upon which the Petitioner seeks divorce is cruelty. She accuses the Respondent of being violent towards her severally and also threatening to shoot and kill her. Fearing for her life, the Petitioner left the matrimonial home in April 2013. She claims that all efforts at reconciliation have failed. The conduct of the Respondent has caused the Petitioner extreme embarrassment and agony and she prayed for the dissolution of the marriage.
3. Although the Respondent was served with the Petition and Notice to Appear, he failed to file appearance. The matter therefore proceeded as an undefended cause.
4. At the hearing, the Petitioner restated what is contained in her Petition. She averrred that upon marriage she and the Respondent stayed in Kwale where the Respondent was a prison officer. The Petitioner was based in Mtongwe. The Respondent became violent in 2012 and whenever the Petitioner visited him, he would beat her up and threatened to shoot and kill her. She testified that one day in April 2013 when the Respondent was extremely violent towards her and wanted to kill her. She screamed and his colleagues came to assist. After that incident, the Petitioner returned to Mtongwe and has not returned to the matrimonial home since. In August 2013, the couple spoke on phone in an attempt to reconcile but when the Petitioner asked the Respondent if he was willing to change, he responded by shouting at her. At that point the Petitioner realised the Respondent had not changed. According to her there is no hope for the marriage and she prayed for dissolution of the same.
5. I have considered the Petition and the uncontroverted testimony of the Petitioner and it is evident that the marriage herein has irretrievably broken down. The marriage herein was conducted at the Registrar’s office in Mombasa. It is therefore a civil marriage. The Marriage Act, 2014 at Section 66(2) provides for the grounds upon which a civil marriage may be dissolved. These include:
(a) adultery by the other spouse;
(b) cruelty by the other spouse;
(c) exceptional depravity by the other spouse;
(d) desertion by the other spouse for at least three years; or
(e) the irretrievable breakdown of the marriage”
6. The Petitioner seeks dissolution of the marriage on the ground of cruelty. She claims the Respondent treated her with cruelty by being violent towards her and threatening to shoot and kill her. As a result of the Respondent’s conduct the Petitioner has suffered extreme trauma and mental anguish. I am satisfied that the ground of cruelty has been proved.
7. From the testimony of the Petitioner, it would appear that there is no hope for the marriage herein which has irretrievably broken down. The parties separated in April 2013 and have not resumed cohabitation.
8. In view of the foregoing, I pronounce a decree of divorce and order that the marriage between the Petitioner and the Respondentsolemnized at the Registrar’s Office in Mombasa on 29. 8.08 be and is hereby dissolved. Decree nisi to issue and the same to be made absolute within 1 month.
DATED, SIGNED and DELIVERED in MOMBASA this 24th day of January 2017
_____________
M. THANDE
JUDGE
In the presence of: -
…………………………………………………………… for the Petitioner
…………………………………………………………… for the Respondent
……………………………………………………..…….. Court Assistant