[2022] KECA 1212 (KLR)

[2022] KECA 1212 (KLR)

The application was dismissed due to the non-appearance of the applicant at the hearing. The court found that, since the applicant was not present to confirm the state of affairs or prosecute its application, and given that the society had already been placed under receivership as submitted by the respondents, there...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] KECA 1212 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Kaaga Farmers Cooperative Society; Respondent: Commissioner of Cooperatives; Respondent: Industrialization and Co-operative Development; Interested Party: Daniel Githiora Gatua; Interested Party: Grace Wangui Mwaura; Interested Party: Francis Gathu Ngure; Interested Party: Daniel Muthee Mwangi
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Application 17 of 2016
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Injunction and Stay Pending Appeal
Outcome
application dismissed for non-appearance with costs
Judges
HA Omondi, KI Laibuta, PM Gachoka
Legal Topics
Injunctions, Stay of Execution, Cooperative Societies Liquidation, Judicial Review, Appeals Procedure
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Commercial and Corporate Injunctions Stay of Execution Cooperative Societies Liquidation Judicial Review Appeals Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kaaga Farmers Cooperative Society

Applicant

Commissioner of Cooperatives

Respondent

Industrialization and Co-operative Development

Respondent

Daniel Githiora Gatua

Interested Party

Grace Wangui Mwaura

Interested Party

Francis Gathu Ngure

Interested Party

Daniel Muthee Mwangi

Interested Party

Procedural Posture

Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Injunction and Stay Pending Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to an injunction restraining the 1st respondent from proceeding with liquidation as per the Gazette Notice.
  2. 2 Whether an order of stay of execution of the Co-operative Tribunal orders should issue pending appeal.
  3. 3 Whether non-appearance of the applicant warrants dismissal of the application.

Ratio Decidendi

The application was dismissed due to the non-appearance of the applicant at the hearing. The court found that, since the applicant was not present to confirm the state of affairs or prosecute its application, and given that the society had already been placed under receivership as submitted by the respondents, there was no basis to grant the orders sought. The only natural consequence in such circumstances is to dismiss the application for non-appearance with costs.

Court Disposition

application dismissed for non-appearance with costs

Orders

  • The application dated January 21, 2016 is dismissed for non-appearance with costs.