[2004] KEHC 2249 (KLR)

[2004] KEHC 2249 (KLR)

The court found that the appellant had demonstrated strong chances of success in the appeal and that the extension of ex-parte orders beyond 14 days was improper under Order 39(3)(2) of the Civil Procedure Code. The court further held that the law does not permit an injunction to restrain a landlord from levying...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2004] KEHC 2249 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Kabundu Holdings Ltd; Respondent: Ali K. Ahmed t/a Sky Club Restaurant
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Mombasa
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
? 48 of 2004
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Ruling on Stay Application Pending Appeal
Outcome
Stay of lower court injunction orders granted; proceedings in lower court stayed pending appeal.
Legal Topics
Stay of Execution, Landlord Tenant Disputes, Distress for Rent, Injunctions, Appeals Process
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Stay of Execution Landlord Tenant Disputes Distress for Rent Injunctions Appeals Process

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kabundu Holdings Ltd

Appellant

Ali K. Ahmed t/a Sky Club Restaurant

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Ruling on Stay Application Pending Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the lower court's injunction restraining the landlord from levying distress should be stayed pending appeal.
  2. 2 Whether the extension of ex-parte orders beyond 14 days under Order 39(3)(2) Civil Procedure Code was proper.
  3. 3 Whether the remedy for wrongful distress is damages and not an injunction.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the appellant had demonstrated strong chances of success in the appeal and that the extension of ex-parte orders beyond 14 days was improper under Order 39(3)(2) of the Civil Procedure Code. The court further held that the law does not permit an injunction to restrain a landlord from levying distress for rent, and that the appropriate remedy for wrongful distress is damages. Consequently, the court allowed the stay of the lower court's injunction orders, enabling the landlord to exercise the right to levy distress, and stayed all proceedings in the lower court case pending the determination of the appeal.

Court Disposition

Stay of lower court injunction orders granted; proceedings in lower court stayed pending appeal.

Orders

  • Stay of the lower court injunction orders against the applicant landlord is granted.
  • The applicant is not restrained from levying distress for rent.