[2024] KEHC 4316 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant, as a first offender who pleaded guilty, expressed remorse, and had the stolen item recovered, was a suitable candidate for a non-custodial sentence. The probation report recommended community service, noting the applicant's positive attitude and lack of criminal history. The court...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2024] KEHC 4316 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Samuel Kadeli; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Eldoret
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Revision E026 of 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Revision / Sentence Review After Conviction on Plea of Guilty
- Outcome
- Custodial sentence set aside; substituted with community service order.
- Judges
- RN Nyakundi
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing Principles, Community Service Orders, First Offender Treatment, Plea of Guilty, Probation Reports
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Samuel Kadeli
Applicant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Revision / Sentence Review After Conviction on Plea of Guilty
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the custodial sentence imposed on a first offender convicted of stealing was appropriate in light of the probation report and other mitigating factors.
- 2 Whether the applicant should be considered for a non-custodial sentence such as community service.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant, as a first offender who pleaded guilty, expressed remorse, and had the stolen item recovered, was a suitable candidate for a non-custodial sentence. The probation report recommended community service, noting the applicant's positive attitude and lack of criminal history. The court held that imprisonment should be avoided for misdemeanours where possible, especially for first offenders, and that community-based rehabilitation was appropriate in this case. Accordingly, the custodial sentence was set aside and substituted with an order for the applicant to perform community service at Soy Health Centre for two months.
Court Disposition
Custodial sentence set aside; substituted with community service order.
Orders
- The custodial sentence imposed on the applicant is set aside.
- The applicant shall perform community service at Soy Health Centre for a period of two months.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
23 paragraphs
Kadeli v Republic (Criminal Revision E026 of 2024) [2024] KEHC 4316 (KLR) (11 April 2024) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 4316 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Eldoret
Criminal Revision E026 of 2024
RN Nyakundi, J
April 11, 2024
Between
Samuel Kadeli
Applicant
and
Republic
Respondent
Ruling
1. The applicant was charged with the offence of stealing contrary to section 268(1) as read with section 275 of the Penal code. The particulars of the offence were that on the 14th day of January, 2024 at around 0500hrs at Soy police station in Soy sub-county within Uasin-Gishu County, the applicant stole one bicycle valued at Kshs. 8,000/=, the property of Soy police station.
2. The applicant pleaded guilty to the offence before Hon. P.N. Areri on 15th January, 2024 and as a consequence, he was convicted on his own plea of guilty and sentenced to a fine of Kshs. 20,000 and in default to serve 6 months imprisonment.
3. The applicant has approached this court pursuant to sections 357,362,364& 382 of the Criminal Procedure Code as construed with Article 50(2) (p) & (q) as conjunctively read with Article 50(6)(a)&(b) of the Constitution.
4. The applicant seeks a sentence review based on the Probation sentence report filed on 25th March, 2024. The said report records as follows:
5. That the applicant does not have any contact details of his relatives and it is clear that he comes from a family that is disintegrated. He is single. Prior to his arrest, he was engaged in casual jobs. There is no information regarding his home background. He intends to go back to soy upon release and continue engaging in casual jobs. He has taken prison sentence positively and he is ready to go out and be a responsible citizen.
6. The report recommended that considering his attitude and the period he has already served, he can perform community service at Soy health Centre for a period of 2 months.
7. In determining whether to impose a custodial or non-custodial sentence, the court is required to take into account the following factors: -a)Gravity of the offence: - sentence of imprisonment should be avoided for misdemeanour.b)Criminal history of the offender. Taking into account the seriousness of the offences, first offenders should be considered for non-custodial sentence.c)Character of the offender: - non-custodial sentence are best suited for offenders who are already remorseful and receptive to rehabilitative measures.d)Protection of the community: - where the offender is likely to pose a threat to the community.e)Offender’s responsibility to third parties: - where there are people depending on the offender.f)Children in conflict with the law: - non- custodial orders should be imposed as a matter of course in cases of children in conflict with law, except in circumstances where, in light of the seriousness of the offence coupled with other factors, the court is satisfied that a custodial order is the most appropriate.
8. The foregoing factors are paramount and from them, I have found efficacy for community-based rehabilitation for the applicant. I find so because he is a first offender, the items were recovered, he has pleaded guilty, he has expressed remorse and he has served part of his sentence in prison, which I believe has shaped his character. In adherence to the probation officer’s report, he is to perform community service at Soy Health Centre for a period of two months.
SIGNED, DATE AND DELIVERED AT ELDORET THIS 11THDAY OF APRIL 2024. R. NYAKUNDIJUDGE