[2021] KEHC 9659 (KLR)
The court found that the Plaintiff had complied with all requirements under the Foreign Judgments (Reciprocal Enforcement) Act and Rules, including providing certified copies of the foreign judgment, proof of service and participation by the Defendant, and confirmation that there was no pending appeal and the time...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2021] KEHC 9659 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Kadere Peasants Development (Public Limited Company) PLC; Defendant: Brazafric Enterprises Limited
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Case E554 of 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application to Register Foreign Judgment
- Outcome
- application allowed; foreign judgment registered
- Judges
- DAS Majanja
- Legal Topics
- Foreign Judgment Enforcement, Reciprocal Enforcement, Registration of Foreign Judgments, Breach of Contract
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kadere Peasants Development (Public Limited Company) PLC
Plaintiff
Brazafric Enterprises Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application to Register Foreign Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the judgment from the High Court of the United Republic of Tanzania is eligible for registration and enforcement in Kenya under the Foreign Judgments (Reciprocal Enforcement) Act.
- 2 Whether the procedural requirements for registration of a foreign judgment have been satisfied.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the Plaintiff had complied with all requirements under the Foreign Judgments (Reciprocal Enforcement) Act and Rules, including providing certified copies of the foreign judgment, proof of service and participation by the Defendant, and confirmation that there was no pending appeal and the time for appeal had expired. The United Republic of Tanzania is a reciprocating country under section 13 of the Act. The Defendant had the opportunity to participate in the Tanzanian proceedings, including filing an appeal, but failed to overturn the judgment. Therefore, the judgment from the High Court of the United Republic of Tanzania, Commercial Division at Mwanza, in Commercial...
Court Disposition
application allowed; foreign judgment registered
Orders
- The judgment issued by the High Court of the United Republic of Tanzania at Mwanza (Commercial Division) in Commercial Case No. 3 of 2014 is registered for enforcement in Kenya.
- Notice of registration of the judgment shall issue and be served upon the Defendant.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
27 paragraphs
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
MILIMANI COMMERCIAL & TAX DIVISION
CORAM: D. S. MAJANJA J.
CIVIL CASE NO. E554 OF 2020
IN THE MATTER OF THE
FOREIGN JUDGMENTS (RECIPROCAL ENFORCEMENT) ACT
BETWEEN
KADERE PEASANTS DEVELOPMENT (PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY) PLC.......PLAINTIFF
AND
BRAZAFRIC ENTERPRISES LIMITED .......................................................................DEFENDANT
RULING
1. The Originating Summons before the Court is dated 22nd December 2020 made under section 5 of the Foreign Judgments (Reciprocal Enforcement) Act (Chapter 43 of the Laws of Kenya)(“theAct”). In the summons, the Plaintiff seeks the following main order:
[1] THAT this Honourable Court be pleased to register the Judgment issued by the High Court of the United Republic of Tanzania at Mwanza (Commercial Division) in Commercial Case No. 3 of 2014 for the purpose of enforcement.
2. The summons is supported by the affidavit of the Plaintiff’s Managing Director, Leonard Faustin Kachebonaho, sworn on 22nd December 2020. The deposition shows that the Defendant is a judgment debtor following determination by the courts in the United Republic of Tanzania (“Tanzania”) and that to date the Defendant has not satisfied the judgment adjudicated by those courts.
3. On 3rd April 2013, Plaintiff herein filed suit against the Defendant at the High Court of the United Republic of Tanzania, Commercial Division at Mwanza; Commercial Case No. 03 of 2014, Kaderes Peasants Development PLC v Brazafric Enterprises Ltd claiming, inter alia, damages for breach of contract. On 3rd June 2016, the court entered default judgment upon failure of the Defendant to filed its Statement of Defence despite service of summons upon it.
4. According to the proceedings, the Defendant filed an application to set aside the judgment by the same was dismissed on 5th September 2014. It filed an appeal in the Court of Appeal, Tanzania; Civil Appeal No. 123 of 2014 but the appeal was struck out on 11th December 2015. The Defendant successfully applied for extension of time to appeal but failed to the Notice of Appeal. Its application to seek extension was struck out on 1st November 2018 and the subsequent application to the Court of Appeal, Tanzania; Civil Application No. 32 of 2008 was struck out on 9th October 2019. On 13th November 2020, the High Court approved the Forms necessary for the Plaintiff to execute the judgment in Kenya.
5. The Summons is supported by duly certified copy of the Judgment and proceedings of the High Court of the United Republic of Tanzania, Mwanza Commercial Division, Commercial Case No. 3 of 2014. It is accompanied by Certificate issued under section 5(4) of the Act confirming that the Defendant made personal appearance through its Principal Officer but never filed a defence, that there was a right of appeal and the appeal instituted in the Court of Appeal, Tanzania was struck out, that there is no appeal pending and that the time for lodging such appeal has now expired. The Plaintiff has also provided certified copies of proceedings to support it case.
6. Based on all the evidence submitted, I am satisfied that the Defendant duly participated in the proceedings before the courts Tanzania hence this summons may be heard ex-parte.
7. As the Plaintiff has complied with the Foreign Judgment (Reciprocal Enforcement) Rules and noting that the United Republic of Tanzania is one of the reciprocating countries under section 13 of the Act, I allow the summons dated 22nd December 2020 and order as follows:
(a) THAT the judgment issued by the High Court of the United Republic of Tanzania at Mwanza (Commercial Division) in Commercial Case No. 3 of 2014 be and is hereby registered.
(b) THAT notice of registration of the judgment do issue and the same shall be served upon the Defendant.
(c) The Defendant shall bear costs of the application.
DATEDand DELIVERED at NAIROBI this25thday of JANUARY,2021.
DAVID S. MAJANJA
JUDGE
Court Assistant: Mr. M. Onyango
Ms Kitonga instructed by S. M. Kitonga and Company Advocates for the Plaintiff.