https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kecopt/2026/241

https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kecopt/2026/241

The Respondent’s denial of receipt of the alleged payment and its explanation regarding fraud affecting the original land and the availability of alternative land raised substantive triable issues touching on liability and the alleged transaction. Because those issues require evidence at a full hearing, the extreme...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2026] KECOPT 241 (KLR)
Parties
Claimant: CYLUS AZEGERE KADURENGE; Respondent: TUNZA HOUSING CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY
Court
Cooperative Tribunal
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Tribunal Case E069 of 2024
Procedural Posture
Co Operative Tribunal Application for Striking Out Statement of Response and Summary Judgment / Interlocutory Ruling on Notice of Motion
Outcome
Application dismissed
Judges
["J Mwatsama", "B Sawe", "F Lotuiya", "M Chesikaw", "PO Aol"]
Legal Topics
Striking Out Pleadings, Summary Judgment, Triable Issues, Alleged Payment for Land Allocation, Interlocutory Application
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Co Operative Law Land Transactions Striking Out Pleadings Summary Judgment Triable Issues Alleged Payment for Land Allocation Interlocutory Application

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

CYLUS AZEGERE KADURENGE

Claimant

TUNZA HOUSING CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Co Operative Tribunal Application for Striking Out Statement of Response and Summary Judgment / Interlocutory Ruling on Notice of Motion

  1. 1 Whether the Respondent’s Statement of Response should be struck out
  2. 2 Whether the Claimant is entitled to summary judgment
  3. 3 Whether the defence raises bona fide triable issues

Ratio Decidendi

The Respondent’s denial of receipt of the alleged payment and its explanation regarding fraud affecting the original land and the availability of alternative land raised substantive triable issues touching on liability and the alleged transaction. Because those issues require evidence at a full hearing, the extreme remedies of striking out and summary judgment were refused.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed

Orders

  • Notice of Motion dated 14 May 2025 dismissed
  • Costs of the application awarded to the Respondent