[2024] KEELC 6129 (KLR)

[2024] KEELC 6129 (KLR)

The court found that the delay in delivery of judgment, while regrettable, is an administrative matter that should be addressed by the applicants or their advocates through direct correspondence with the Chief Magistrate, rather than by invoking the supervisory jurisdiction of the Environment and Land Court. There...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KEELC 6129 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Japheth Mshote Kafuta; Applicant: Mngwana Kastrungi; Applicant: Stephen Kilelo Melanyi; Applicant: Samuel Mesanai Shadrack; Applicant: Mohamed Osman Maow; Applicant: Obed Mnene Luwero; Applicant: John Mwanyalo; Applicant: Teresia Atieno Oduor; Applicant: Agnes Nasetiay Samuel; Respondent: Chief Magistrates Court -Mombasa; Respondent: Attorney General; Interested Party: Trustees Anglican Church of Kenya; Interested Party: Patrick Maza; Interested Party: Kenneddy Mwandigha; Interested Party: Julius Mwanzighe Nyambu; Interested Party: Rosemary Mbugua; Interested Party: Margarat Mnyanyi; Interested Party: Getrude Chombo
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Mombasa
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Miscellaneous Case E051 of 2024
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Supervisory Orders Regarding Delayed Judgment
Outcome
application dismissed
Judges
NA Matheka
Legal Topics
Supervisory Jurisdiction, Delay in Judgment, Administrative Action, Judicial Review
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Supervisory Jurisdiction Delay in Judgment Administrative Action Judicial Review

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Japheth Mshote Kafuta

Applicant

Mngwana Kastrungi

Applicant

Stephen Kilelo Melanyi

Applicant

Samuel Mesanai Shadrack

Applicant

Mohamed Osman Maow

Applicant

Obed Mnene Luwero

Applicant

John Mwanyalo

Applicant

Teresia Atieno Oduor

Applicant

Agnes Nasetiay Samuel

Applicant

Chief Magistrates Court -Mombasa

Respondent

Attorney General

Respondent

Trustees Anglican Church of Kenya

Interested Party

Patrick Maza

Interested Party

Kenneddy Mwandigha

Interested Party

Julius Mwanzighe Nyambu

Interested Party

Rosemary Mbugua

Interested Party

Margarat Mnyanyi

Interested Party

Getrude Chombo

Interested Party

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Supervisory Orders Regarding Delayed Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the Environment and Land Court should exercise its supervisory jurisdiction to call for the lower court file due to delayed delivery of judgment.
  2. 2 Whether the delay in delivering judgment amounts to a denial of justice warranting intervention by the superior court.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the delay in delivery of judgment, while regrettable, is an administrative matter that should be addressed by the applicants or their advocates through direct correspondence with the Chief Magistrate, rather than by invoking the supervisory jurisdiction of the Environment and Land Court. There was no evidence of refusal or failure by the trial court to deliver judgment, only administrative delay. The application was therefore not merited and was dismissed, with no orders as to costs, as the matter was undefended and did not warrant judicial intervention at this stage.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The application is dismissed.
  • There shall be no orders as to costs.