[2025] KEHC 2115 (KLR)

[2025] KEHC 2115 (KLR)

The court found that the sentencing record did not indicate that the period the applicant spent in remand custody was considered in the 18-year sentence for defilement. Section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code is mandatory, requiring courts to factor in time spent in custody before sentencing. The applicant was...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2025] KEHC 2115 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Samson Kaguni Alias 240; Respondent: Republic
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Eldoret
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Petition E063 of 2023
Procedural Posture
Criminal Petition / Ruling on Sentence Computation
Outcome
application allowed
Judges
E Ominde
Legal Topics
Sentencing, Remand Custody Credit, Sexual Offences, Defilement, Sentence Review
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Sentencing Remand Custody Credit Sexual Offences Defilement Sentence Review

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Samson Kaguni Alias 240

Applicant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Petition / Ruling on Sentence Computation

  1. 1 Whether the period spent in remand custody should be factored into the applicant's sentence as required by Section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.
  2. 2 Whether the sentencing record reflects consideration of the remand period.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the sentencing record did not indicate that the period the applicant spent in remand custody was considered in the 18-year sentence for defilement. Section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code is mandatory, requiring courts to factor in time spent in custody before sentencing. The applicant was in remand from 18th September 2019 to 28th May 2021, totaling 1 year and 8 months. The court allowed the application and directed that this period be computed as part of the applicant's sentence, thereby reducing the effective custodial term accordingly.

Court Disposition

application allowed

Orders

  • The period of 1 year and 8 months spent in remand custody shall be computed as part of the applicant's 18-year sentence.