[1987] KEHC 69 (KLR)
The court found that the sentence of 18 months imprisonment imposed on the appellant for the offence of cheating was excessive considering the offence is a misdemeanour and the circumstances of the case. The judge exercised discretion to set aside the custodial sentence and substituted it with a fine of Kshs 1,000,...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [1987] KEHC 69 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Musau; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Machakos
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Appeal 197 of 1987
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- sentence_varied
- Judges
- ENA Torgbor
- Legal Topics
- Cheating Offence, Sentencing Principles, Misdemeanour, Appeal on Sentence
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Musau
Appellant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence of 18 months imprisonment for cheating was excessive in the circumstances of the case.
- 2 What is the appropriate sentence for the offence of cheating in this case.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the sentence of 18 months imprisonment imposed on the appellant for the offence of cheating was excessive considering the offence is a misdemeanour and the circumstances of the case. The judge exercised discretion to set aside the custodial sentence and substituted it with a fine of Kshs 1,000, with a default custodial term of three months. Additionally, the appellant was ordered to repay Kshs 1,520 to the complainant, with a further default term of one month imprisonment. The decision was based on the principle of proportionality in sentencing and the court's power to impose a fine instead of imprisonment for misdemeanour offences.
Court Disposition
sentence_varied
Orders
- The sentence of 18 months imprisonment is set aside and substituted with a fine of Kshs 1,000 in default three months imprisonment.
- The appellant is ordered to repay Kshs 1,520 to the complainant in default one month additional term of imprisonment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
15 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT MACHAKOS
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO 197 OF 1987
MUSAU...................................APPELLANT
VERSUS
REPUBLIC.................................RESPONDENT
JUDGMENT
August 8, 1987 Torgbor J delivered the following Judgment.
This is an appeal against sentence only. The appellant was convicted for cheating and sentenced to 18 months imprisonment.
The offence is a misdemeanour and in my view and in all the circumstances of this case the said sentence is excessive and it is set aside and substituted by fine of Kshs 1,000 in default 3 months imprisonment.
Appellant is ordered to repay Kshs 1,520 to the complainant in default one month additional term of imprisonment.
August 8, 1987
TORGBOR
JUDGE