[2023] KEHC 3427 (KLR)

[2023] KEHC 3427 (KLR)

The court held that the applicant's request was merited, as section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code mandates that any period spent in custody prior to the date of sentencing must be taken into account when computing the term of imprisonment. The applicant had spent seven months and four days in custody before...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KEHC 3427 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Enos Kalo; Respondent: Republic
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kisumu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Criminal Application E062 of 2022
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Consideration of Pre Sentence Custody Period
Outcome
Application allowed.
Judges
RE Aburili
Legal Topics
Sentencing, Pre Sentence Custody, Robbery With Violence, Rape, Resentencing, Criminal Procedure
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Sentencing Pre Sentence Custody Robbery With Violence Rape Resentencing Criminal Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Enos Kalo

Applicant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Consideration of Pre Sentence Custody Period

  1. 1 Whether the period spent in custody prior to sentencing should be considered in computing the applicant's sentence.
  2. 2 Whether section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code applies to the applicant's resentencing.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the applicant's request was merited, as section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code mandates that any period spent in custody prior to the date of sentencing must be taken into account when computing the term of imprisonment. The applicant had spent seven months and four days in custody before being sentenced. The court therefore ordered that the thirty-year imprisonment term imposed upon resentencing should be calculated from the date of arrest, with the pre-sentence custody period deducted. This ensures compliance with statutory requirements and fair administration of justice.

Court Disposition

Application allowed.

Orders

  • The thirty (30) years imprisonment that the applicant was resentenced to shall be calculated taking into account the period he spent in custody from November 3, 2003 to June 7, 2004.
  • Order to be extracted.