[2015] KEELC 590 (KLR)

[2015] KEELC 590 (KLR)

The court found that the plaintiff had demonstrated a prima facie case by showing evidence of lawful allocation and registration of the suit land in his name. The defendants, particularly the 1st defendant who holds a parallel title, failed to file any opposition or provide evidence of the authenticity of her title....

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2015] KEELC 590 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Kamau James Njendu; Defendant: Serah Wanjiru Mburu; Defendant: Registrar of Titles, Nyandarua
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Nakuru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 19 of 2014
Procedural Posture
Injunction Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Injunction
Outcome
interlocutory injunction granted
Judges
MA Silau
Legal Topics
Land Title Disputes, Injunctive Relief, Fraudulent Transfer, Registration of Titles
Source Language
en
Land and Property Land Title Disputes Injunctive Relief Fraudulent Transfer Registration of Titles

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kamau James Njendu

Plaintiff

Serah Wanjiru Mburu

Defendant

Registrar of Titles, Nyandarua

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Injunction Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Injunction

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiff has established a prima facie case for grant of an interlocutory injunction.
  2. 2 Whether the defendants should be restrained from interfering with the plaintiff's possession of the suit land pending determination of the suit.
  3. 3 Whether an order of inhibition should issue to prevent further dealings with the suit property.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the plaintiff had demonstrated a prima facie case by showing evidence of lawful allocation and registration of the suit land in his name. The defendants, particularly the 1st defendant who holds a parallel title, failed to file any opposition or provide evidence of the authenticity of her title. In the absence of any challenge to the plaintiff's title and given the risk of dispossession or further dealings with the property, the court held that the plaintiff was entitled to interlocutory injunctive relief. The court further found it appropriate to issue an order of inhibition to prevent any registration of disposition in respect of the suit land pending the hearing...

Court Disposition

interlocutory injunction granted

Orders

  • The defendants are barred from entering, being upon, evicting, or in any other way interfering with the possession and occupation of the plaintiff over land parcel Nyandarua/Mutonyora/565.
  • An order of inhibition is issued, inhibiting the registration of any disposition in the register of land parcel Nyandarua/Mutonyora/565.