[2015] KEHC 4680 (KLR)

[2015] KEHC 4680 (KLR)

The court held that although the application for leave to appeal out of time was not accompanied by a supporting affidavit as required, the interests of justice warranted granting the applicant an opportunity to file and serve the necessary affidavit. The absence of a supporting affidavit was not raised as a...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2015] KEHC 4680 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Kamau Muhia; Respondent: Agricultural Finance Corporation
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Murang'a
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Civil Application 100 of 2013
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Preliminary Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time
Outcome
Applicant granted leave to file and serve supporting affidavit; further directions reserved.
Judges
DW Mbuteti
Legal Topics
Leave to Appeal Out of Time, Affidavit Requirement, Service of Documents
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Leave to Appeal Out of Time Affidavit Requirement Service of Documents

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kamau Muhia

Appellant

Agricultural Finance Corporation

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Preliminary Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time

  1. 1 Whether the application for leave to appeal out of time is competent in the absence of a supporting affidavit.
  2. 2 Whether the interests of justice require the applicant to be given an opportunity to file a supporting affidavit.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that although the application for leave to appeal out of time was not accompanied by a supporting affidavit as required, the interests of justice warranted granting the applicant an opportunity to file and serve the necessary affidavit. The absence of a supporting affidavit was not raised as a competency issue at the hearing, but since the application was based on alleged facts, those facts must be certified by affidavit. The court therefore directed the applicant to file and serve a supporting affidavit within 14 days, with liberty to the respondent to reply, ensuring procedural fairness and adherence to the rules of civil procedure.

Court Disposition

Applicant granted leave to file and serve supporting affidavit; further directions reserved.

Orders

  • Applicant to file and serve a supporting affidavit within 14 days.
  • Respondent at liberty to file and serve a replying affidavit within 14 days of service.