[2025] KECA 659 (KLR)

[2025] KECA 659 (KLR)

The Court found that the applicant had demonstrated sufficient grounds for the amendment of the memorandum of appeal. The amendments were necessary to enable the Court to determine the real issues in controversy and were not shown to cause prejudice to the respondents, who did not oppose the application. The Court...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2025] KECA 659 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Jean Njeri Kamau; Respondent: Action Aid International Kenya Board; Respondent: Association of Action Aid International; Respondent: William Ntoina
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Nakuru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Appeal (Application) E009 of 2020
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal Application / Application for Leave to Amend Memorandum of Appeal
Outcome
Application allowed.
Judges
PM Gachoka
Legal Topics
Amendment of Pleadings, Leave to Amend, Court Discretion, Memorandum of Appeal
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Amendment of Pleadings Leave to Amend Court Discretion Memorandum of Appeal

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jean Njeri Kamau

Applicant

Action Aid International Kenya Board

Respondent

Association of Action Aid International

Respondent

William Ntoina

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal Application / Application for Leave to Amend Memorandum of Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the applicant should be granted leave to amend the memorandum of appeal.
  2. 2 Whether the mistakes in the memorandum of appeal, attributed to the advocate, should be allowed to be corrected without prejudice to the respondents.
  3. 3 Whether the application meets the threshold for amendment under the Court of Appeal Rules.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court found that the applicant had demonstrated sufficient grounds for the amendment of the memorandum of appeal. The amendments were necessary to enable the Court to determine the real issues in controversy and were not shown to cause prejudice to the respondents, who did not oppose the application. The Court exercised its discretion judiciously, guided by the relevant rules and authorities, and allowed the application for leave to amend the memorandum of appeal. The applicant was directed to file the amended memorandum within seven days, failing which the orders would lapse. Costs were ordered to abide the outcome of the appeal.

Court Disposition

Application allowed.

Orders

  • The applicant is granted leave to amend the memorandum of appeal as per the proposed amended memorandum of appeal.
  • The applicant shall file the amended memorandum of appeal dated 12th February 2024 within seven days from the date of this order, failing which the orders shall lapse automatically.