[2024] KECPT 1717 (KLR)

[2024] KECPT 1717 (KLR)

The tribunal found that the claimant had established membership in the respondent society and had contributed Kshs. 830,500, which was not disputed by the respondent. The respondent failed to file any defence or appear, and the claimant's evidence was uncontroverted. The tribunal held that the claimant was entitled...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KECPT 1717 (KLR)
Parties
Claimant: Jonathan Nyamweya Kamau; Respondent: Kenya Qatar Diaspora Savings and Credit Society
Court
Cooperative Tribunal
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Tribunal Case 259/E 020 of 2022
Procedural Posture
Tribunal Claim / Judgment
Outcome
judgment for claimant in part
Judges
BM Kimemia, Janet Mwatsama, B Sawe, F Lotuiya, P. Gichuki, M Chesikaw, PO Aol
Legal Topics
Cooperative Society Disputes, Member Contributions, Dividend Entitlement, Accounting and Audit, Vehicle Purchase Agreements
Source Language
en
Commercial and Corporate Civil Procedure Cooperative Society Disputes Member Contributions Dividend Entitlement Accounting and Audit Vehicle Purchase Agreements

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jonathan Nyamweya Kamau

Claimant

Kenya Qatar Diaspora Savings and Credit Society

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Tribunal Claim / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the claimant is entitled to repayment of his contributions as per the member's account statement.
  2. 2 Whether the claimant is entitled to dividends on his contributions from the respondent.
  3. 3 Whether the respondent is obligated to provide a true record of accounts and income from the taxi business managed on behalf of the claimant.

Ratio Decidendi

The tribunal found that the claimant had established membership in the respondent society and had contributed Kshs. 830,500, which was not disputed by the respondent. The respondent failed to file any defence or appear, and the claimant's evidence was uncontroverted. The tribunal held that the claimant was entitled to repayment of his contributions as per the member's account statement. However, the claim for dividends failed because the claimant did not provide audited accounts or evidence that dividends had been declared by the respondent. The tribunal further ordered the respondent to provide a true record of account from the taxi business within 30 days. The alternative prayer for a...

Court Disposition

judgment for claimant in part

Orders

  • Repayment of Kshs. 830,500 as per member's account statement of December 2021.
  • Respondent to provide a true record of account from the claimant's taxi business and its income within 30 days.