[2024] KEHC 6683 (KLR)

[2024] KEHC 6683 (KLR)

The court found that the application dated 30th June 2003 seeking transfer of Nyando RMCC No. 71 of 2001 was never prosecuted. In accordance with the Civil Procedure Rules, applications that are not prosecuted may be dismissed for want of prosecution. The court exercised its discretion to dismiss the application and...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KEHC 6683 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Isaac Chege Kamau; Applicant: Samwel Nyutu Kamau; Respondent: Diomisio Njeru Mimiu; Defendant: Fahari Building & Civil Engineering Ltd; Defendant: Dick Obel Otieno
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kisumu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Civil Application 150 of 2003
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Transfer of Suit
Outcome
application dismissed for want of prosecution
Judges
RE Aburili
Legal Topics
Transfer of Suit, Dismissal for Want of Prosecution
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Transfer of Suit Dismissal for Want of Prosecution

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Isaac Chege Kamau

Applicant

Samwel Nyutu Kamau

Applicant

Diomisio Njeru Mimiu

Respondent

Fahari Building & Civil Engineering Ltd

Defendant

Dick Obel Otieno

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Transfer of Suit

  1. 1 Whether the application for transfer of Nyando RMCC No. 71 of 2001 should be allowed.
  2. 2 Whether the application should be dismissed for want of prosecution.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the application dated 30th June 2003 seeking transfer of Nyando RMCC No. 71 of 2001 was never prosecuted. In accordance with the Civil Procedure Rules, applications that are not prosecuted may be dismissed for want of prosecution. The court exercised its discretion to dismiss the application and ordered that there be no orders as to costs. The file was ordered closed for archiving.

Court Disposition

application dismissed for want of prosecution

Orders

  • The application dated 30th June 2003 is dismissed for want of prosecution.
  • No orders as to costs.