[2023] KEHC 20159 (KLR)
The High Court found that the sentence of two years imprisonment without the option of a fine was excessive in the circumstances. Exercising its revisionary jurisdiction, the court set aside the custodial sentence and substituted it with a fine of Kshs. 20,000, with a default sentence of two years imprisonment. The...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2023] KEHC 20159 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Bernard Kamau; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nakuru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Revision E637 of 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Revision / Ruling
- Outcome
- sentence set aside and substituted with fine; default custodial sentence imposed
- Judges
- SM Mohochi
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing Review, Imprisonment Without Option of Fine, Substitution of Sentence
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Bernard Kamau
Applicant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Revision / Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence of two years imprisonment without the option of a fine was appropriate and lawful.
- 2 Whether the applicant is entitled to a review of sentence under criminal revision jurisdiction.
Ratio Decidendi
The High Court found that the sentence of two years imprisonment without the option of a fine was excessive in the circumstances. Exercising its revisionary jurisdiction, the court set aside the custodial sentence and substituted it with a fine of Kshs. 20,000, with a default sentence of two years imprisonment. The court held that the interests of justice would be served by allowing the applicant the option of a fine, and that the original sentence was not proportionate to the offence or the circumstances of the applicant.
Court Disposition
sentence set aside and substituted with fine; default custodial sentence imposed
Orders
- The sentence imposed on the applicant on November 11, 2022 is set aside.
- The applicant is fined Kshs. 20,000.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
19 paragraphs
Kamau v Republic (Criminal Revision E637 of 2022) [2023] KEHC 20159 (KLR) (4 July 2023) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2023] KEHC 20159 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Nakuru
Criminal Revision E637 of 2022
SM Mohochi, J
July 4, 2023
Between
Bernard Kamau
Applicant
and
Republic
Respondent
Ruling
RULING ON CRIMINAL REVISION 1. The application for Criminal Review seeks to disturb an imprisonment for two years without the option of fine.
2. This court has considered the motion and finds the same to be of merit.
3. The sentence imposed on the applicant on the November 11, 2022 is hereby set aside and in substitute thereof.
4. The applicant is fined a sum of Kshs.20,000 in default of payment of the fine the applicant shall serve an imprisonment of 2 years from the November 11, 2022. It is so ordered.
SIGNED, DATED AND DELIVERED IN OPEN COURT AT NAKURU ON THIS 4TH JULY 2023. .........................Mohochi S.MJUDGEIn the presence of: -Court Assistant – ScholaState Counsel – Ms. Mburu