[1996] KECA 18 (KLR)

[1996] KECA 18 (KLR)

The Court held that the failure to include a certified copy of the decree in the record of appeal is a fatal procedural defect under rule 85(1)(h) of the Court of Appeal Rules. As a result, the appeal is incompetent and must be struck out. The Court exercised its discretion not to make any order as to costs.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[1996] KECA 18 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Kamondia Tuti; Respondent: Wairimu Kamau
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Appeal 102 of 1992
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Order Striking Out Appeal for Procedural Defect
Outcome
appeal struck out as incompetent
Judges
JE Gicheru, RO Kwach
Legal Topics
Appeal Record Requirements, Procedural Incompetence, Striking Out Appeal
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Appeal Record Requirements Procedural Incompetence Striking Out Appeal

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kamondia Tuti

Appellant

Wairimu Kamau

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Order Striking Out Appeal for Procedural Defect

  1. 1 Whether the absence of a certified copy of the decree in the record of appeal renders the appeal incompetent.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court held that the failure to include a certified copy of the decree in the record of appeal is a fatal procedural defect under rule 85(1)(h) of the Court of Appeal Rules. As a result, the appeal is incompetent and must be struck out. The Court exercised its discretion not to make any order as to costs.

Court Disposition

appeal struck out as incompetent

Orders

  • The appeal is struck out for want of a certified copy of the decree in the record of appeal.
  • No order as to costs.