[2025] KEHC 4330 (KLR)

[2025] KEHC 4330 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant had demonstrated a likelihood of suffering substantial loss if stay was not granted, as the respondent is a minor with no independent means and the next friend failed to provide evidence of her ability to refund the decretal sum. The application was made within a reasonable time,...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2025] KEHC 4330 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Steve Sumbi Kamuya; Respondent: EM (Minor suing thro' mother & next friend Eunice Ngina Nzioka)
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Machakos
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Appeal E022 of 2025
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Stay Application Ruling
Outcome
application_allowed
Judges
EN Maina
Legal Topics
Stay of Execution, Substantial Loss, Security for Decretal Sum, Personal Injury Award
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Tort Law Stay of Execution Substantial Loss Security for Decretal Sum Personal Injury Award

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Steve Sumbi Kamuya

Appellant

EM (Minor suing thro' mother & next friend Eunice Ngina Nzioka)

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Stay Application Ruling

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has demonstrated likelihood of suffering substantial loss if stay is not granted pending appeal.
  2. 2 Whether the application for stay of execution was made without unreasonable delay.
  3. 3 Whether the applicant is willing to provide security for the due performance of the decree.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant had demonstrated a likelihood of suffering substantial loss if stay was not granted, as the respondent is a minor with no independent means and the next friend failed to provide evidence of her ability to refund the decretal sum. The application was made within a reasonable time, and the applicant expressed willingness to provide security. The court held that the appeal was arguable, particularly on the issue of the Small Claims Court's jurisdiction. Consequently, the court exercised its discretion to grant a conditional stay of execution, requiring the entire decretal sum to be deposited in court or in a joint interest-earning account within thirty days.

Court Disposition

application_allowed

Orders

  • Stay of execution of the decree in SCCC No. E530 of 2024 pending appeal is granted, conditional upon the entire decretal sum being deposited in court or in a joint interest-earning account within thirty days.
  • The appellant/applicant shall bear the costs of this application.