[2024] KEELC 13209 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant had rendered legal services to the respondent, resulting in a taxed advocate-client bill of costs. The certificate of taxation issued by the Deputy Registrar had not been set aside or appealed, making it final as to the amount due. The applicant properly served the respondent's...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2024] KEELC 13209 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Anthony Thuo Kanai t/a A Thuo Kanai Advocates; Respondent: Vishisht Talwar
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Nairobi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Application 8 of 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Judgment
- Outcome
- Judgment entered for the applicant against the respondent for the certified sum plus interest; no costs awarded for the application.
- Judges
- JA Mogeni
- Legal Topics
- Advocate Client Costs, Certificate of Taxation, Judgment Entry, Service of Process
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Anthony Thuo Kanai t/a A Thuo Kanai Advocates
Applicant
Vishisht Talwar
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to judgment in terms of the certificate of taxation as against the respondent.
- 2 Whether interest at 14% per annum is payable from the specified date pursuant to Rule 7 of the Advocates (Remuneration) Order, 2009.
- 3 Whether the application was properly served and unopposed, justifying entry of judgment without further proceedings.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant had rendered legal services to the respondent, resulting in a taxed advocate-client bill of costs. The certificate of taxation issued by the Deputy Registrar had not been set aside or appealed, making it final as to the amount due. The applicant properly served the respondent's advocate with the application and hearing notice via email, in compliance with Order 5 Rule 22B. There was no opposition to the application. The court held that under Section 51(2) of the Advocates Act, judgment should be entered for the certified sum. Further, interest at 14% per annum from the date of judgment until payment in full was awarded pursuant to Rule 7 of the Advocates...
Court Disposition
Judgment entered for the applicant against the respondent for the certified sum plus interest; no costs awarded for the application.
Orders
- Judgment is entered for the applicant against the respondent in the sum of Kshs. 357,357.76 as certified by the Deputy Registrar.
- Interest at 14% per annum is awarded on the certified sum from the date of judgment until payment in full.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
26 paragraphs
Kanai t/a A Thuo Kanai Advocates v Talwar (Miscellaneous Application 8 of 2018) [2024] KEELC 13209 (KLR) (14 November 2024) (Judgment)
Neutral citation: [2024] KEELC 13209 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the Environment and Land Court at Nairobi
Miscellaneous Application 8 of 2018
JA Mogeni, J
November 14, 2024
Between
Anthony Thuo Kanai t/a A Thuo Kanai Advocates
Applicant
and
Vishisht Talwar
Respondent
Judgment
1. A.Thuo Kanai & Company Advocates are the Applicants in the application dated 3/08/2022. At all material times the said law firm were instructed and acted for Vishisht Talwar the Respondent/Client herein in the preparation of the Agreement for Sale where he was purchasing LR No. 152 situate in Limuru which services the applicant rendered and which gave rise to the Bill of Costs filed in this matter.
2. The said firm filed its Advocate-client Bill of costs which was taxed in the Respondent’s absence after the taxing officer was satisfied of service to the Respondent.
3. The certificate of Taxation was served upon the Respondent’s Advocates, Zed Achoki & Company Advocates on diverse dates.
4. I have confirmed from the Deputy Registrar’s Ruling in issuing the Certificate of Taxation that the Respondent had filed their submissions in response to the applicant’s submissions and having heard and considered the submissions the Deputy Registrar Hon Isabella Barasa arrived at the applicant’s advocate-client Bill of costs dated 24/01/2018 taxed at Kshs. 357. 357. 76. through her ruling delivered on 15/03/2021.
5. The ruling has not been appealed against nor set aside and it is the subject of the applicant’s application before this court seeking the court to adopt the Certificate as a judgment of this Honorable Court.
6. The applicant, by its application which is premised on Section 51 (2) of the Advocates Act, Rule 7 of the Advocates (Remuneration Order, 2009) Order 51 Rule 1 of the CPR and all other enabling provisions of the law seeks1. That this Honorable Court be pleased to enter judgment for the sum of Kshs 357,357. 76 in costs as Certified by the Deputy Registrar on the 15th March 20212. That this Honorable Court be pleased to award interest on the said sum of Kshs 357,357. 76 at the rate of 14% per annum from 15th February 2018 being one month after service of the fee note on the Respondent/Client specifying that interest will be charged on costs until payment of costs, pursuant to Rule 7 of the Advocates (Remuneration ) Order, 2009. 3.That the costs of this application be provided for.
7. I am satisfied that the respondent’s advocate was served with this application and the hearing notice. An affidavit of service dated 22/07/2024 was filed and it shows that the respondent’s advocate received the same via email. The amendment introduced by Order 5 Rule 22B allows service by email thus the affidavit of service is considered proof enough that service was effected, even if the person being served declines to acknowledge receipt. Rule 22B allows service by e-mail to the Defendant's last confirmed and used email address.
8. In the instant case this is the last known address for the Counsel of the Respondent.
9. There being no opposition, and the court being satisfied that the application is properly grounded in law, I enter judgment for the Applicant against the Respondent in terms of the certificate of taxation in the sum of Kshs. 357,357. 76/= plus interest at 14% per annum from the date of the judgement until payment in full.
10. I decline to award costs of this application since it is unopposed.
It is so ordered
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED VIRTUALLY AT NAIROBI THIS 14TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2024. ……………………………MOGENI JJUDGEIn the virtual presence of:Mr. Thuo for the ApplicantNo appearance for the RespondentMs. Caroline Sagina - Court Assistant.……………………………MOGENI JJUDGE